Quote:
Originally Posted by dennypayne
This. None of these moulds are poor so it's not worth saturating the market with duplicates. Plus NG's specialty seems to be smaller aircraft, so I say more CRJ's, make a Metro, make a Beech 1900, make a Bandeirante (please!!  ). I don't buy bizjets but I get that they are pretty popular so those fit their forté as well. We need more variety, not less. |
First of all, how can you say it is their speaciality to create small aircraft - they also did the comac 919.
https://www.diecastaircraftforum.com...e-ng99001.html
I agree, we need more variation - but variation means a risk sometimes. So we need models which sell without any doubt - and these are the early 737s and 721/722.
Second: you did not get the point regarding the moulds being metioned above. It is pretty easy to make a model already being released not being a dublicate despite it is wearing the same livery - just give it a different registration. Btw. Inflight models are limited and in case i would want a model IF previously released I would have to hope for another manufacturer to release it. - correct me if I am wrong. So yes, we do need dublicates of certain models because some might want THAT specific model in THIS livery. And if you do not have different options - mouldwise - estbblished manufacturers can sell the same substandard stuff over decades without the need to change anything on their moulds.
Once again: it makes no sense to choose bad instead of good accuaracy when you got the choice. It is pretty common to replace a model with a more accurate when available btw.