Saw a post on FB advertising new Panda releases in a Ryanair 737, a DHL, Koryo, and 2 Cubana Cargo 204s.
Anyone else see that? Are Panda and NG mould sharing?
I see them too. The Ryanair is a 737-700.
There was previously some mention of a disagreement between NG and Panda over the Tu-204. The details were lacking. I doubt this is the NG mould so that would make 3 Tu-204 moulds in production or planning. That's a bit much!
__________________
Richard
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Location: Hangzhou, Zhejiang; Peoples Republic of China
Posts: 7,259
Re: New Panda preorders?
Let the crooks and bottomfeeders try to out do eachother!
__________________
Enjoying aviation from a "TSA-free Zone"!!
Take the money-grab & deceit out of our hobby, and bring back ethics and quality!!
Just say NO to Apollo400/Black Box/NG(No Good)/Panda Models/Junk-X/First Choice/C&C/IF400/Witty400/Magic/AV200/AK200/Flightline/Flightline200/Flightline400/Pegasus/Blue Angle/5stars & any BigBirds (real or fake)
Ordered the Ryanair. Still hoping for a non wingleted 737-800 in the first livery it wore some day or even a 737-200 in that livery before it went to the billboard style. We got a 1/200 737-200 not too long ago but a big gap in Ryanair history in 1/400 while Phoenix and others continue to pump out more of the current scheme
__________________
More Southwest State Flag Liveries!
I doubt this is the NG mould so that would make 3 Tu-204 moulds in production or planning. That's a bit much!
If this is the case, I couldn't agree more. One set of Ty-204 moulds would surely suffice for the limited liveries available. To think that some of the effort expended in the other two could have been put into a Ty-114 or something else new makes wonder just WTAF the management of these manufacturers is thinking...
That said, instead of being a new mould, is it possible that Panda had obtained a stock of blanks from NG before their falling out?
Why go to a "blogspot" when you can observe and buy:
Because he only has to click one link, and I offer insight and value with my posts ! It's almost like saying why go to an alternative forum? Wait nobody does do they
Because he only has to click one link, and I offer insight and value with my posts ! It's almost like saying why go to an alternative forum? Wait nobody does do they
Oh they go to alternate forums and sites, not just the "All Hail Richard Forum" cause he thinks he knows everything, go to a site that has them listed and purchase. Seems easy enough but your ego is in need of inflating so I understand completely.
Because he only has to click one link, and I offer insight and value with my posts ! It's almost like saying why go to an alternative forum? Wait nobody does do they [IMG class=inlineimg]https://www.diecastaircraftforum.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif[/IMG]
Oh they go to alternate forums and sites, not just the "All Hail Richard Forum" cause he thinks he knows everything, go to a site that has them listed and purchase. Seems easy enough but your ego is in need of inflating [IMG class=inlineimg]https://www.diecastaircraftforum.com/images/smilies/lol.gif[/IMG] so I understand completely.
It's doing marketing to his site, I don't see nothing wrong.... If the people don't like, don't see.
Oh they go to alternate forums and sites, not just the "All Hail Richard Forum" cause he thinks he knows everything, go to a site that has them listed and purchase. Seems easy enough but your ego is in need of inflating so I understand completely.
I don’t see the problem here either. Yes, it is sometimes painful having to visit another website that is just hyperlinked on this forum on a certain topic. But this is not only with Richard and his very comprehensive website with always interesting and most of the times unbiased in-depth reviews of model releases and new moulds. It goes for everyone who is posting pictures of his latest purchase and just provides one (or even no) photo here but just the link to FlickR and other sides.
You definitely do not need to like Richard or his way of reviewing but his work is outstanding and provides one of the most complete and unbiased collection of model reviews and news.
I don’t see the problem here either. Yes, it is sometimes painful having to visit another website that is just hyperlinked on this forum on a certain topic. But this is not only with Richard and his very comprehensive website with always interesting and most of the times unbiased in-depth reviews of model releases and new moulds. It goes for everyone who is posting pictures of his latest purchase and just provides one (or even no) photo here but just the link to FlickR and other sides.
You definitely do not need to like Richard or his way of reviewing but his work is outstanding and provides one of the most complete and unbiased collection of model reviews and news.
The point I was trying to point out is, if a collector is interested in a model then you go to a site that is selling the model, then without a biased review a collector can purchase the model instead of hunting one down because they where reading what he had to say.
The point I was trying to point out is, if a collector is interested in a model then you go to a site that is selling the model, then without a biased review a collector can purchase the model instead of hunting one down because they where reading what he had to say.
Your point was well-recognized. Still, you are talking about ‘biased reviews’ which is not the fact concerning Richard’s website. In your most recent post, however, you are no longer talking about the (rather general) pain having to be redirected from one site to another but exclusively about www.yesterdaysairlines.com, so I guess you’re having an agenda (A. Klein quoted).
14Likes
New Panda preorders?
so I understand completely.
Your Privacy Choices
