N(early) G(ood) Models 787 - - DA.C
 

Go Back   DA.C > Ground Control > 1:400 Scale Model Aircraft

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 08-26-2019, 09:12 AM   #1 (permalink)
Insane Collector
 
IflyHA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 1,567
Default N(early) G(ood) Models 787 -

I just received 3 of the Dreamliners from last months set of NG releases; Virgin Atlantic, British Airways, and Air Canada. I first purchased the Qantas release when the mould was brand new, and while it was awesome in many ways (i.e. the engine details and printing), the nose seemed off and the gear too tall. The nose gear was addressed for this round of releases and seems accurate, but not the main gear. They still sit too tall and coupled now with correct nose gear, it is all the more noticeable.

In the case of both my Virgin and Air Canada models, the gear also were angled in, as if the gear were being retracted, making them look too close together. This is where JC has got them beat with their 787. While their engines are too large, their landing gear proportions are more indicative of the 787. Fortunately, the gear was not so hard to remove, and once I removed by of them, I noticed rather quickly what the issue might be: the main gear doors attached to the gear p. The way that the gear fit inside the wing peg forces the gear door in as well. Taking a small file, I filed at the top of the gear door them to fit in properly, giving a more accurate gear height. However, if one major change could be made, it would be to shorten the gear axles entirely as was done for the nose gear. The mould is fantastic, but JC still has the upper hand IMO.


N(early) G(ood) Models 787 --capture.jpg

N(early) G(ood) Models 787 --capture.jpg-2.jpg

Second point is the cockpit window printing. JC once again takes the lead in producing an accurate cockpit section. Take a look at these two comparison shots courtesy of Arcunia.com. Why does NG's 787 cockpit window printing droop down towards the center of the nose in such a noticeable manner? JC correctly printed this, and even added the reddish hue that the 787 is known for.

N(early) G(ood) Models 787 --qantas.jpg

These two things corrected, would absolutely give NG the upper hand, and given the amount of talk surrounding their models, these things should be addressed if we are really to consider them the new benchmark for the hobby. They make great models, yes, but each of their moulds have quirks and flaws that others do correctly.
IflyHA is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-29-2019, 09:37 AM   #2 (permalink)
Diecast Quality Inspector
 
Adrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Posts: 4,203
Default Re: N(early) G(ood) Models 787 -

NG are aware of these issues and say they will correct them for subsequent releases.
__________________
Adrian



DC-8s still needed to be done in 1/400: Air Ceylon, Air Spain, Seaboard World (-63CF)

Comets still missing- Dan Air (4 & 4C), United Arab Airlines/Misrair/Egyptair, Kuwait AW, Sudan AW, East African AW, Saudi Royal Flt.

Caravelles still not made: Luxair, Air Algerie,SABENA (final scheme), Libyan Arab Airlines, SAS ( SCANDINAVIAN titles scheme)

Ilyushin IL-18s still not made: Tarom (billboard,) Malev (1st scheme),Cubana, Balkan/ Tabso-Bulgarian Air Transport,
Adrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2019, 05:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Collector
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 42
Default Re: N(early) G(ood) Models 787 -

anyone have a photo of nose of NG's AeroMexico 787-9 Quetzalcoatl ? Is it another angry 787-9 ? I'd rather wait for revised version than buy this funny looking 787-9...
Ericson is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 09-02-2019, 09:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
1/600 & 1/400 Fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Shropshire
Age: 45
Posts: 5,641
Default Re: N(early) G(ood) Models 787 -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ericson View Post
anyone have a photo of nose of NG's AeroMexico 787-9 Quetzalcoatl ? Is it another angry 787-9 ? I'd rather wait for revised version than buy this funny looking 787-9...
I seriously doubt they will remake the same aircraft again due to an error this small but anyway here it is. Personally I really don't think it has much of an impact and the irony considering how poor Phoenix 787s are in general, and the size of errors from other manufacturers makes this pretty small potatoes. It is unlikely that JC Wings would make this 787 given it is firmly in Gemini territory. Feel free to disagree though:

Aeromexico Boeing 787-9 by rstretton, on Flickr
Attached Thumbnails
N(early) G(ood) Models 787 --878.jpg  
__________________
Richard


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
RStretton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 11:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
Insane Collector
 
dennypayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,410
Default Re: N(early) G(ood) Models 787 -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ericson View Post
anyone have a photo of nose of NG's AeroMexico 787-9 Quetzalcoatl ? Is it another angry 787-9 ? I'd rather wait for revised version than buy this funny looking 787-9...
As you can see in Richard's photo, it does somewhat have the 'angry' look, and it's also got the too-tall main gears, but I sold on my Phoenix version of it anyway because NG got the colors of the design much more true to life than Phoenix did, IMO. Particularly the green near the nose. So on display in my cabinet, the color is what I notice most, and led me to prefer the NG over the Phoenix.

On the other hand, I kept my Phoenix British Airways 789 because they got the colors right. On that one, for whatever reason, the too-tall main gears on the NG seemed to show up worse.
__________________

1:200 Wishlist
Sun Country 727-200 late 1990s colors
Yamal & Interjet SSJ
Kenya Airways 737-800 New colors
Alrosa Tu-134 old colors

Flown on: A221/223/300/310/319/320/321/321N/332/333/339/343/359/351/380 AN24/28/38/148 AT42/72 B190
B717/722/732/3/4/5/7/8/M8/9/M9 B741/744/752/753/762/763/764/772/773/788/789 C206/208/402
CR1/2/7/9 D8S D93/4/5 DHC2/3T/7/8-200/Q400 Do228/328J E110/120/135/140/145/170/175/190
F50/100 JS31 L10/15 L410 MD11/82/83/87/88/90 RJ85 S340/2000 SSJ100 T134/154 YK42
dennypayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 11:23 AM   #6 (permalink)
Insane Collector
 
IflyHA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 1,567
Default Re: N(early) G(ood) Models 787 -

Quote:
Originally Posted by RStretton View Post
I seriously doubt they will remake the same aircraft again due to an error this small but anyway here it is. Personally I really don't think it has much of an impact and the irony considering how poor Phoenix 787s are in general, and the size of errors from other manufacturers makes this pretty small potatoes. It is unlikely that JC Wings would make this 787 given it is firmly in Gemini territory. Feel free to disagree though:

Aeromexico Boeing 787-9 by rstretton, on Flickr


This picture perfectly illustrates my point. The angry cockpit windows combined with the stilt-like and inward facing main gear give JC the slight edge over NG with this mold. However, NG has gotten the engine size and detailing spot on.
IflyHA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.

Latest Threads
 

Models of the Week
 



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.