Location: Hangzhou, Zhejiang; Peoples Republic of China
Posts: 7,259
Re: PHOTOS - Flightline 200 - MD-80 - Aeromexico
White top or chrome??? With those colors who cares!!
WTF is with those colors? Somebody colorblind or something?
What a horrific POS JC presents to us!!
__________________
Enjoying aviation from a "TSA-free Zone"!!
Take the money-grab & deceit out of our hobby, and bring back ethics and quality!!
Just say NO to Apollo400/Black Box/NG(No Good)/Panda Models/Junk-X/First Choice/C&C/IF400/Witty400/Magic/AV200/AK200/Flightline/Flightline200/Flightline400/Pegasus/Blue Angle/5stars & any BigBirds (real or fake)
Andrew, if you don't like these JC releases (which is obvious), please go on sniffing your Aeroclassics releases through your nose and continue writing bull****, that comes from a mind in delirious state.
If there is a personal problem between you and Johan Chan, talk to him and get the piss out of here.
The shown models aren't perfect but ok. No need for this ongoing "POS tape" you are playing on and on again. It simply bores the **** out of me to read these stupid comments, that are obviously motivated by a deadly mixture of envy, hate, resentment and other reasons but are in no way related to the subject. Just piss off please and get back in the basement, you just escaped from.
Location: Hangzhou, Zhejiang; Peoples Republic of China
Posts: 7,259
Re: PHOTOS - Flightline 200 - MD-80 - Aeromexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by vertigo
Andrew, if you don't like these JC releases (which is obvious), please go on sniffing your Aeroclassics releases through your nose and continue writing bull****, that comes from a mind in delirious state.
If there is a personal problem between you and Johan Chan, talk to him and get the piss out of here.
The shown models aren't perfect but ok. No need for this ongoing "POS tape" you are playing on and on again. It simply bores the **** out of me to read these stupid comments, that are obviously motivated by a deadly mixture of envy, hate, resentment and other reasons but are in no way related to the subject. Just piss off please and get back in the basement, you just escaped from.
I'm not holding a gun to your head to read anything!
I have as much right, as any other collector, to state my opinion on the models presented. The one in question is a POS, plain and simple! How some of you choose to lower the hobby's standards so greatly to accept this garbage is beyond me, however, you don't see me writing towards those who praise, like the way you write about me who criticizes. I believe then, it is you who needs to piss off, and adjust his attitude accordingly!
I won't be as civil next time!
__________________
Enjoying aviation from a "TSA-free Zone"!!
Take the money-grab & deceit out of our hobby, and bring back ethics and quality!!
Just say NO to Apollo400/Black Box/NG(No Good)/Panda Models/Junk-X/First Choice/C&C/IF400/Witty400/Magic/AV200/AK200/Flightline/Flightline200/Flightline400/Pegasus/Blue Angle/5stars & any BigBirds (real or fake)
White top or chrome??? With those colors who cares!!
WTF is with those colors? Somebody colorblind or something?
What a horrific POS JC presents to us!!
Of course you are entitled to give your opinion, although by now most of the forum members are starting to get the message concerning your dislike of JC wings / Flightline models.
However I fail to see the rationale in your thinking, when I compare your reaction on the Skyline A300 Dan Air model.
Quoting you :
"You can not compare a British made, hand made at that, work of art, with a Chinese mass produced model or toy.
Always remember; you get what you pay for!! "
Between a hand made 200 USD + model full of flaws without antennas, messed up nose, window line & engines, fixed u/carriage, thickly glossed, horrible wing box seam, and a 50 USD chinese model tampo-printed, rolling gears, decent wing to fuselage junction, antennas, my choice is made.
How come the Skylines are still available when they have been sitting for years at CAM, only to be sold at half price today ?
As a side note, I am waiting for a decent A300 to be made, the JC version is just not good enough, even if it is an improvement compared to the Skyline.
But that does not mean I'll bash each JC Wings product at every oportunity.
Location: Hangzhou, Zhejiang; Peoples Republic of China
Posts: 7,259
Re: PHOTOS - Flightline 200 - MD-80 - Aeromexico
Only in Nevada & California; look at whom they voted for this past week!
__________________
Enjoying aviation from a "TSA-free Zone"!!
Take the money-grab & deceit out of our hobby, and bring back ethics and quality!!
Just say NO to Apollo400/Black Box/NG(No Good)/Panda Models/Junk-X/First Choice/C&C/IF400/Witty400/Magic/AV200/AK200/Flightline/Flightline200/Flightline400/Pegasus/Blue Angle/5stars & any BigBirds (real or fake)
Only in Nevada & California; look at whom they voted for this past week!
Better than a nutttt who can't even speak in public because she's just too stupid. Fact is the race for senate here was more a vote for which candidate to you hate the least.
Hi Agent and friends, Is this mould the same as the Gemini or Jet X? what is your opinion about this mould? I will appreciate your comments.
Hi Ernesto.
I would say this is not the Jet X mould based on the fact that Jet X lacks those strakes on the engines in addition to another shape on top of the vertical fin. As far as GJ goes, they use a mould with the same engines and vertical fin, but a tailcone of the newer type (screwdriver shaped or beaver tail as they call it) . Hope this helps..
PS. I would prefer to see the cockpit windshield placed a bit lower as far as the center, left and right "sections" go .
Hi Ernesto.
I would say this is not the Jet X mould based on the fact that Jet X lacks those strakes on the engines in addition to another shape on top of the vertical fin. As far as GJ goes, they use a mould with the same engines and vertical fin, but a tailcone of the newer type (screwdriver shaped or beaver tail as they call it) . Hope this helps..
PS. I would prefer to see the cockpit windshield placed a bit lower as far as the center, left and right "sections" go .
I was thinking it looks more Gemini because the main gear doors aren't too long and the nose is a bit pointed.
__________________
.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Hi Ernesto.
I would say this is not the Jet X mould based on the fact that Jet X lacks those strakes on the engines in addition to another shape on top of the vertical fin. As far as GJ goes, they use a mould with the same engines and vertical fin, but a tailcone of the newer type (screwdriver shaped or beaver tail as they call it) . Hope this helps..
PS. I would prefer to see the cockpit windshield placed a bit lower as far as the center, left and right "sections" go .
Thanks a lot gottols your explanation is so clear
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Andrew is right about the white one, its colors are totally wrong but to say the same about the other one I need to have sharp eyes (which I din´t have).
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I love both of them...
Something about MD-80s, I just can't choose...
They are just lovely...
__________________
BENJAMIN
Please visit "Other Scales & Antique Models" forum for my 1/100 models! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.