Because it is a 5 week cycle there will be no July announcement
1:200-Scale Gemini200
G2ACA796 Air Canada Express CRJ200 C-FIJA
G2ASA855 Alaska B737 MAX 9 N913AK
G2ASA865 Alaska/Horizon Air Dash 8 Q400 N421QX (1981 retro livery)
CEB2321 Cebu Pacific A321neo RP-C4118
G2UAE776 Emirates B777-300ER A6-EPK (“Expo 2020” Blue Baubles)
G2FDX825 FedEx MD-11F N625FE
G2KLM839 KLM A330-200 PH-AOM (new livery)
G2DLH792 Lufthansa B747-400 D-ABVM (new livery)
G2PAA859 Pan Am A310-300 N823PA “Clipper Golden Light”
G2RAA773 Royal Australian Air Force A330-200 MRTT A39-006
Nice releases! GREAT to see the re release of the FedEx MD11!!! KLM A330 also very nice in the new colors. Very curious how Gemini's A310 turns out..
Thanks for posting Crownvic.
__________________
KLM fanatic, also Lufthansa, Air France, Delta, Pan Am, Swissair, Sabena etc. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'm guessing both the LH 744 and FedEx MD-11 will both be big winners!
My thoughts exactly! Missed out on the FedaEx the last time around; wont let that happen again. The Lufthansa is also a must for me as its one of my few airlines I try to have one of each.
It's interesting that they chose to model one of the converted from passenger MD-11s rather than a purpose built freighter version like the prior release. The prototype has all of the windows still visible even though they're no longer see through.
It's interesting that they chose to model one of the converted from passenger MD-11s rather than a purpose built freighter version like the prior release. The prototype has all of the windows still visible even though they're no longer see through.
Looking forward to this. Hoping every single re-release has a different registration number as well.
Last edited by Sean's AA DC-10; 07-18-2019 at 07:44 PM.
__________________
KLM fanatic, also Lufthansa, Air France, Delta, Pan Am, Swissair, Sabena etc. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
KLM fanatic, also Lufthansa, Air France, Delta, Pan Am, Swissair, Sabena etc. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Looks similar to the Inflight counterpart - not in a good way....have to see it in person, but judged from that pic i do not expect a good result. My hope for an accurate a310 is Aeroclassics - - and ONLY Aeroclassics. Thy did an amazing job on the 1/400 so why they should fail on a 1/200 version. Several manufacturers seem to have problems in printing cheatlines/windowlines and px doors on the correct level - on common moulds (with thousands of pics of the real thing), why?
__________________ *** more classic liveries please ***
Last edited by European Collector; 07-25-2019 at 06:08 PM.
Nose looks identical to InFlight. And that's not bad. It's just the way the Airbus looks. That's good news because we now have two big manufacturers offering a wide variety to choose from. Great job GJ and IF.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I am looking at the issues J.P. brought up in my thread "Photos of Inflight 200 A310"
Note that Inflight will be touching up the A310 mould, so this comparrison is with the V 1.0, with only one photo of the GJ so far.
#1 The underside of the PW engines are flat, as they should be on the GJ, it's curved on the IF
#2 The window line goes up near the tail section, looks as though both need a bit more
#3 Window lines, Pan Am titles & emergency door are all to high of IF. Window line and emergency door is much lower, Pan Am titles are maybe even a tad to low on GJ
#4 The nose looks good on the GJ, it's just wrong on the IF.
In my opinion the GJ is vastly superior, the minor issues are not noticeable unless you pull out your dacrometer. Let's see how the IF V2.0 turns out.
__________________
Mr Burns
For Sale:
GJ2 Air Tahiti Nui A340-300, F-OLOV, G2THT376
GJ2 Qantas A380-800, VH-OQE, G2QFA409
Wanted:
Herpa Lufthansa 737-200, D-ABBE, 559430
PM me if you want to sell, buy or trade any of the above.
Nose looks identical to InFlight. And that's not bad. It's just the way the Airbus looks. That's good news because we now have two big manufacturers offering a wide variety to choose from. Great job GJ and IF.
you must have taken 1 too many in the eyes, that nose doesn't look a thing like the inflight version.
And definatily a different mold, compare the pics closely and see the difference in nose shape.
__________________
KLM fanatic, also Lufthansa, Air France, Delta, Pan Am, Swissair, Sabena etc. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Nose looks identical to InFlight. And that's not bad. It's just the way the Airbus looks. That's good news because we now have two big manufacturers offering a wide variety to choose from. Great job GJ and IF.
you must have taken 1 too many in the eyes[IMG class=inlineimg]https://www.diecastaircraftforum.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif[/IMG], that nose doesn't look a thing like the inflight version.
Looks very good so far.
Nice bait. Just thought I'd lend an opinion (which I'm entitled to). What's funny is that this whole thread is moot because the A310 is not in my collection criteria. Lol
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I have the Pan Am A310 on pre-order. The mould, of course, is far superior to the Hobby Monster version. The only thing that I noticed is the blue ball logo on the tail is a little low, and too small. When PA went to the billboard livery, the logo was enlarged on the tail.
__________________
Collector of American, Air Canada, British Airways, Pan Am and 1/200 fighter jets
They should pay a little more attention to the shape of the lower half of the wingtip fence. Furthermore, the cabin windows should go upwards a little more towards the rear of the fuselage (perspective of this single photo might not represent the actual angle). Otherwise, it looks nice overall. Cannot say anything about other details, haven't seen it in person yet.
__________________ My 1/200 Wants List for 2019 Gemini:Martinair 767-300ER (1990's 'Martinair Holland' c/s), Condor 757-300 (1999 delivery cs.), Condor 757-300WL (2004 white/blue/yellow cs.) Inflight:United A320-200 (post-merger c/s), Swiss A330-300 & A340-300 (both in 2003 c/s)
Overall it looks pretty good. better in my opinion than the current Inflight version.
Still I think, that the passenger windows on the Gemini could be a bit larger and the tail appears to be too "thin" (chord length).
But overall I think I will go for it.
what do the others think?
Did you notice that the gj version has winglets and the if has not? And the Pan Am text on the fuselage is different too. Nice that arcunia has both models photographed the same.. good comparison.
__________________
KLM fanatic, also Lufthansa, Air France, Delta, Pan Am, Swissair, Sabena etc. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Did you notice that the gj version has winglets and the if has not? And the Pan Am text on the fuselage is different too. Nice that arcunia has both models photographed the same.. good comparison.
Huh? The G200 represents the A310-300, thus the wingtip fences.
The IF200 is the medium range -200 version.
The comparo side by sides shows even more how bad and bungled the IF mold is. Engines too low, weird pylons, wrong shape nose...
The G200 is magnitude more realistic.
Gemini Jets August Announcement
, that nose doesn't look a thing like the inflight version. 
