My goodness, IF200 certainly has improved their 787-9 mould! I no longer collect models and only have one left in my collection (GJ400 Virgin 789) but if IF200 were to ever release a Virgin 789 I'd buy it. (Yeah, I know, not gonna happen.) So much better than any of the other manufacturers.
Awesome model it seems tha IF200 is trying to make a comeback when it comes to better details and accuracies etc.
Still hoping they would get updated B747 moulds though, thereby leaving out the cradle wing mounting method and doing the same as they do here with their Dreamliner series.
Great addition though Steve, Ochre Livery would look awesome ona Dreamliner,after seeing the classic roo on the box aah the memories.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Thanks Guys Merry Christmas to you all. I also noticed some more detail like Jan noticed too. Anyhow Jean Pierre Inflight200 Air France 787-9 F-HRBF is coming soon you will be impressed. Merry Christmas Everyone
Here is the no step markings photo I forgot. Took about ten photos to get the right one.
a Phoenix arrived as well on the same day VH-ZNC a review of the two in a few days I am going down to Jervis Bay " Huskinson beach" for Christmas. Be safe everyone
Last edited by Aussiejets; 12-23-2018 at 06:41 PM.
Thank you Steve.
QANTAS and KLM fans are certainly the most spoiled collectors, so many models available.
That said, I am not going to complain too much, I have just received an excellent Inflight AF A 340.
I have been waiting for 26 years for an accurate die cast model of this aircraft.
Someone said that patience is a virtue.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of you.
Jean Pierre.
J-P, I received my AF A343 as well and am more than happy with it! I owned the Gemini version briefly, however couldn't appreciate it with the notable flaws.
On top of the A343, I received the Swiss A333 and it looks absolutely superb!
Thanks Guys Merry Christmas to you all. I also noticed some more detail like Jan noticed too. Anyhow Jean Pierre Inflight200 Air France 787-9 F-HRBF is coming soon you will be impressed. Merry Christmas Everyone
Here is the no step markings photo I forgot. Took about ten photos to get the right one.
a Phoenix arrived as well on the same day VH-ZNC a review of the two in a few days I am going down to Jervis Bay " Huskinson beach" for Christmas. Be safe everyone
On level ground, why the vertical tail fin on IF200 787-9 looks way higher than Phoenix model 787-9? And the Phoenix 787-9 vertical tail looks SMALL? Which is more accurate?
On level ground, why the vertical tail fin on IF200 787-9 looks way higher than Phoenix model 787-9? And the Phoenix 787-9 vertical tail looks SMALL? Which is more accurate?
Very nice model Steve! Glad you like it, the mold is certainly great. JP, as mentioned before the AF 789 is allready announced by inflight.
Whishing everybody here a wonderful christmas and a happy new year.
__________________
Main collections: Lufthansa, KLM, Martinair, Transavia, Pan Am, Delta. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
On level ground, why the vertical tail fin on IF200 787-9 looks way higher than Phoenix model 787-9? And the Phoenix 787-9 vertical tail looks SMALL? Which is more accurate?
I was't going to purchase anymore Phoenix models due to their fixed gear down policy, but couldn't help myself with getting another Qantas 787-9 Dreamliner. There is a huge difference. I hope you all noticed the horizontal positioning mounts on the Inflight200 tooling. Anyhow this topic is worthy of another thread.
__________________
Owner of Fleets To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Thanks mate. You need this one to go with Phoenix ones
yep. but th eprioirty is slightly lower . have couple of more to go before i come back to this one
__________________
Owner of Fleets To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'm enclosing a pic of why I avoid Inflight if I can as one of their weak points is haphazard and approximate application of graphics on models. This is endemic to many of their offerings (cheat-lines, window lines, logos, panels etc.)
Both cargo doors are placed / printed too low, and that jumped off the screen the minute I saw the otherwise great pics.
Also, the radome representation is too small.
Last edited by ALITALIA AZ610; 01-05-2019 at 04:19 PM.
I'm enclosing a pic of why I avoid Inflight if I can as one of their weak points is haphazard and approximate application of graphics on models. This is endemic to many of their offerings (cheat-lines, window lines, logos, panels etc.)
Both cargo doors are placed / printed too low, and that jumped off the screen the minute I saw the otherwise great pics.
Also, the radome representation is too small.
You might be right there on cargo doors too low, thanks for pointing that out and the size of the radar dome. As per the title of this thread - this is Inflight200 first release on their brand new 787-9 tooling. A few little tweeks to fix and tampo print the engine cowlings and all will be better for future releases on this excellent mould. Let's see what the future holds. Cheers
INFLIGHT200 first 787-9 model-Qantas VH-ZNB
Your Privacy Choices
