Go Back   DA.C > Custom Creations > What if ???

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 10-10-2002, 10:45 PM   #1
Master Collector
 
HannibalHays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 841
Question B727re?

Questions on one of my favorite aircraft line... specifically the B727RE...

Was a B727RE ever built or was it only on paper?
The RB211.535 Turbofan was slated for it?
Was it to remain a trijet or convert to a twin?
Are there any images of this interesting beast?
What did it look like?
Wonder if I could create a custom model?!

Any info is appreciated!
__________________
Scott
HannibalHays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 11:15 PM   #2
The Patriot
 
DeltaFlot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Laurel, MD
Age: 36
Posts: 3,228
Send a message via AIM to DeltaFlot Send a message via Yahoo to DeltaFlot
Default

I hope you can translate French, cause this was the only thing I could find

Quote:
Prototype remotorisé pour donner au 727-200 les capacités du 757.
It sounds to me its a re-engined 727-200 suposedly with the capabilties in some sort of fashion as a 757. but I took Spanish in High School, so I could be totally off the mark ont his one.
__________________
Febuary 15, 1898
December 7, 1941
June 8, 1967
September 11, 2001
Never Forget, Never Forgive

If you kick the Tiger in the arse, you better be able to deal with the Tiger's teeth.
DeltaFlot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 11:37 PM   #3
Master Collector
 
bigredvmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 786
Send a message via AIM to bigredvmi
Default

isn't the RE the same as the Super 27?

http://www.airliners.net/search/phot...nct_entry=true



http://www.worldairroutes.com/Cougar.html


www.super27.com/pdf/22461.pdf
__________________
- Drew

Sell crazy somewere else were all stocked up here
bigredvmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 02:14 AM   #4
Master Collector
 
HannibalHays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 841
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bigredvmi
isn't the RE the same as the Super 27?
Wow! I'm not sure... I've found one reference refering to the JT8D-217 (Super 27) and the RB211.535 but it was in French as I recall... It looks like laterday MD housings on the side of a 722 and wow, that #2 inlet sure looks puny by comparison....
__________________
Scott
HannibalHays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 08:06 AM   #5
Master Collector
 
HerpaBryce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Age: 18
Posts: 833
Send a message via AIM to HerpaBryce Send a message via MSN to HerpaBryce
Default

The english translation of that french up there is "to give the 727-200 the capacity of the 757"

I'm guessing it was for making the 727-200 bigger and better.
__________________
See my airliner renderings here - http://community.webshots.com/user/banages

See my collection here
HerpaBryce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 08:10 AM   #6
Master Collector
 
HerpaBryce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Age: 18
Posts: 833
Send a message via AIM to HerpaBryce Send a message via MSN to HerpaBryce
Default

If you read the last attached thing on bigredvmi's post on the top it says 727-223RE (Super27)

So there's your answer. The 722RE is the Super27.
__________________
See my airliner renderings here - http://community.webshots.com/user/banages

See my collection here
HerpaBryce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 06:39 AM   #7
I'm watching you...
 
AirDar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Land of BBQ & thin chips
Posts: 1,787
Lightbulb Not just RE, but RE-EVERYTHING!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by HannibalHays
Questions on one of my favorite aircraft line... specifically the B727RE... The RB211.535 Turbofan was slated for it?... Was it to remain a trijet or convert to a twin?
Hey Scott...

Russ has bandied about my concept alot on these pages in various forms, but in light of your questions, (and at the request of others here and elsewhere) I'm re-posting MY thought on what "This Beast" might have looked like had the 757 NOT been made after all...



I used the 787 designation because I felt that Boeing MIGHT have felt that the updates to this model made it different enough to warrant it. As I have "designed" it here the modifications are as follows:

•New lengthend fuselage with updated door mechanisms and additional mid-cabin exits

•2 Rolls Royce RB-211-500 series engines (Third centerline engine omitted)

•Completely new supercritical wing section with wider span, new configuration of flaps and spoilers and winglet kit.

•Modified vertical stabilizer

•Re-located APU with 777 type exhaust

•New section, wider span horizontal stabilizer

•updated interior throughout

•Advanced and updated 2 man glass cockpit.

Available in 3 lengths and various ranges -100, -200, -300 (shown)

Enjoy again!
__________________
Dar~

Yours is not to question why,
Yours is but to BUY or DIE!
AirDar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 06:43 AM   #8
I'm watching you...
 
AirDar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Land of BBQ & thin chips
Posts: 1,787
Default

...And here is the same concept with the Pratt & Whitney engines shown in Delta colors...

__________________
Dar~

Yours is not to question why,
Yours is but to BUY or DIE!
AirDar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 10:05 PM   #9
Master Collector
 
HannibalHays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 841
Default

Hmmm... so to create a Super 27 custom model I just need a MD-80 to give up it's #1 & #2...
__________________
Scott
HannibalHays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 11:51 PM   #10
Go-Getters Go Ozark
 
Sentinel Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: DFW/THE GREAT STATE OF TEXAS
Posts: 4,167
Default

A Super 27 is still a 727 with less-than-radical modifications. The primary mods in the Super 27 involve acoustic treatment to the engines to reduce noise- the center engine has its thrust reverser removed as well and the mods to the flap settings and optional winglets.

Several years ago there was a proposal (by Cammacorp, but I'm not sure) for a more radical modification which would have transformed the 727-200 into a twin with the substitution of CFM56 engines and deletion of the center engine with reprofiling of the fin. Dar's rendition looks eerily similar!

My understanding of the disposition of the project was that it was poo-pooed behind the scenes by Boeing as it would have affected 757 sales. A past issue of Airways had a picture of a model while the October issue of Airliner World talks about Cougar's Super 27s in detail.
__________________
Piss on noise abatement!
Sentinel Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2002, 02:59 PM   #11
Insane Collector
 
Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Escondido, Ca. USA
Age: 50
Posts: 2,763
Smile

I believe Bob Crandall at AA solicited a major modification to the 727-200 from Boeing prior to selecting the MD-80 series. Specifics included installing a "bullet" style fairing over the #2 engine inlet, replacing the remaining 2 JT-8's with a high-bypass turbofan, creating a 2-pilot cockpit with "glass" instrumentation, zero-timing the airframe, etc. The answer, of course, was NO!!
__________________
Fly the Friendly Skies of United

uniTED takes wing Feb 12, 2004
Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2002, 03:10 PM   #12
Master Collector
 
bigredvmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 786
Send a message via AIM to bigredvmi
Default

What issue of Airliners ... do you know?
__________________
- Drew

Sell crazy somewere else were all stocked up here
bigredvmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2002, 10:50 PM   #13
Romania is #1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

man thats weird. used to the three holer
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2002, 03:04 PM   #14
Master Collector
 
Airliners!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Posts: 562
Default Re: Not just RE, but RE-EVERYTHING!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by AirDar
"This Beast" might have looked like had the 757 NOT been made after all...

Excellent work! One suggestion: it should have a 757 style nose - the 757 was originally to have the 727/737 nose until the PSA midair, when one of the criticisms was the poor visibility from the 727 cockpit.
__________________
Russell

www.airline-hobby.com
Airliners! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2002, 09:54 PM   #15
I'm watching you...
 
AirDar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Land of BBQ & thin chips
Posts: 1,787
Default Re: Re: Not just RE, but RE-EVERYTHING!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Airliners!
...it should have a 757 style nose
Fair suggestion, but the real reason I did this is because I'm such a 727 nut! If I changed the cockpit, it would bear little resemblence to a 727 anymore... I would also have to change out the fuselage cross section in the forward half of the plane because of the lack of a lower lobe in the 757 frame. I was going for a way of LENGTHENING and REFRESHING the old 727 frame in a more radical way than they later did on the 737... Besides, if the 727 cockpit is REALLY that bad, why is Boeing not only still using it on the NG 737's they are REMOVING the eyebrow windows!

Anyway... like I said, it's a fair comment. Maybe I'll do what you suggest one day and make a DIFFERENT "What If" out of it!
__________________
Dar~

Yours is not to question why,
Yours is but to BUY or DIE!
AirDar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2002, 07:49 PM   #16
Master Collector
 
HannibalHays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 841
Default

If I could track down some extra DW MD engine housings I would customize some Super 27's...
__________________
Scott
HannibalHays is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
Copyright © 1998 - 2008, DiecastAircraft.com & Wings900.com - All rights reserved
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

© 1997-2006 DiecastAircraftForum.com. This website, the content, the design and the pictures and are intended for public non commercial use, and may be redistributed, freely printed, or electronically reproduced in its complete and unaltered form provided distribution is for private use only. Partial and other distribution means require the permission of Wings900. All rights reserved.