Go Back   DA.C > Miscellaneous > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-27-2006, 06:56 PM   #51
Retro Junkie
 
psalover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: IN HELL!!!! Gotta Get Out!!!
Age: 37
Posts: 2,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2272V View Post

Clinton did not get impeached for getting a *******. This is the favorite claim of the Left. He was impeached for lying under oath.
Although he should have been fired for such an indescretion, which is the fate most would receive in the private sector, he was not impeached for a "blow job." Please get the FACTS straight.
Your right, But when he "lied under oath" What was he under oath for? Was he under oath for testomony for the Monica Lewinski investigation? I know the answer, Do you?
psalover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 08:27 PM   #52
Master Collector
 
ARIUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Whitehorse, YT
Posts: 603
Default

One thing I'm curious about is the disappearance of the term liberal. It has now been replaced with leftist. Is this change meant to more accurately describe those that would fall into this category? If so, then an explanation of the difference between leftist and liberal is needed.
__________________
Fly Air North,Yukon's Airline
ARIUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 09:16 PM   #53
Master Collector
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Silver Spring, MD USA
Posts: 756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psalover View Post
Your right, But when he "lied under oath" What was he under oath for? Was he under oath for testomony for the Monica Lewinski investigation? I know the answer, Do you?

If I'm not mistaken, he lied under oath in a deposition during the Paula Corbin Jones sexual harrassment civil suit.
Criton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 02:52 AM   #54
Insane Collector
 
Hapag-Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 40
Posts: 2,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Criton View Post
If I'm not mistaken, he lied under oath in a deposition during the Paula Corbin Jones sexual harrassment civil suit.
Does it matter today? I believe the USA has bigger problems today than a BJ the recepient, a president whose last term ended six years ago, would not admit at first.
__________________
THIS SPACE 4 RENT!!!
Hapag-Lloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 03:11 AM   #55
Retro Junkie
 
psalover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: IN HELL!!!! Gotta Get Out!!!
Age: 37
Posts: 2,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Criton View Post
If I'm not mistaken, he lied under oath in a deposition during the Paula Corbin Jones sexual harrassment civil suit.
Your right. He was being questioned about Paula Jones, when Ken Starr through in a question that was not part of this disposition, and frankly was a personal, Family matter. He was cought off gaurd, and did what any normal man would have done. Lied to protect his family. It was not a lie about national security. It wasn't a lie that caused thousands of soldiers to die. It was a lie, about something that happened between two consenting adults. That question should have never have been asked.

How many times has George Bush Lied? Lied us into a war with Iraq( I know you and Jim are going to love that statement) But honestly say he didn't lie about the war, but you know he's lied, Cheany's Lied. Hell, Why didn't they let any of the Oil Executives go under oath, BECAUSE THEY LIED THROUGH THEY'RE TEETH. This administration is full of currpotion,Lies, and deciet. Look at all the REPUBLICAN congressmen who have been busted,going to be convicted, or already have been convicted for taking bribes. Abramhoff Scandel? While you, and Jim feed into their crap, they are making multi Million dollor side deals of mine and your backs. Sean Hannidy? While your drinking his coolaide, he's going to his Million dollor home, in his high dollor sport ute, probably an Escalade decked out. While your listening to this guys tell you one thing, they are doing the other.

Im not just picking on the repubicans, they are the ones that are in power right now. If the Dems were as obvious, and as currupt has the republicans, I would feel the same way about it. Anybody who is cought taking bribes, should be tar, and feathered.
psalover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 03:16 AM   #56
Retro Junkie
 
psalover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: IN HELL!!!! Gotta Get Out!!!
Age: 37
Posts: 2,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ARIUS View Post
One thing I'm curious about is the disappearance of the term liberal. It has now been replaced with leftist. Is this change meant to more accurately describe those that would fall into this category? If so, then an explanation of the difference between leftist and liberal is needed.
You have to understand, that the right has leaned so far to the right, that anybody that is main stream, is considered a leftist by the right wing coolaid drinking fundamentalist. They also subscribe to if your not with us, you must be against us theory. Thats why Jim attacks everybody who he may THINK is leaning slightly left. Like he attacked Moomins. He will even attack one of his own. It really shows the veciousness of the rightwing agenda.
psalover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 12:10 PM   #57
Master Collector
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Silver Spring, MD USA
Posts: 756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psalover View Post
Your right. He was being questioned about Paula Jones, when Ken Starr through in a question that was not part of this disposition, and frankly was a personal, Family matter. He was cought off gaurd, and did what any normal man would have done. Lied to protect his family.
Your chronology is not quite correct. Clinton's original perjury occurred when he was being questioned under oath by Paula Jones' attorneys in conjunction with her lawsuit. The assertion that he was caught off guard by a question about womanizing during a sexual harassment lawsuit is just plain ludicrous.

As for the rest of your diatribe, please stop putting words in my mouth. You have no idea where I stand on practically any issue.

Last edited by Criton; 09-28-2006 at 12:13 PM.
Criton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 05:20 PM   #58
Retro Junkie
 
psalover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: IN HELL!!!! Gotta Get Out!!!
Age: 37
Posts: 2,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Criton View Post
Your chronology is not quite correct. Clinton's original perjury occurred when he was being questioned under oath by Paula Jones' attorneys in conjunction with her lawsuit. The assertion that he was caught off guard by a question about womanizing during a sexual harassment lawsuit is just plain ludicrous.
As for the rest of your diatribe, please stop putting words in my mouth. You have no idea where I stand on practically any issue.
Oh. Excuse me, The perjury came from the questioning in front of a Grand Jury, About Paula Jones,I do not want to say your correct again, because I don't want to insult you,GOD forbid.

I also Agree with you about the fact that he was a womanizer,but Monica Lewinski was not filing charges, nor did she report any miscounduct from Clinton. The question that was asked was if he had a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinski. A question that any married man would deny. Paula Jones was a sexual herrasment suit. So the detail was a small detail, that was minor. He didn't out a CIA agent, He didn't start a war with a country for his own agenda, and thousands of American Children didn't die in HIS war, for HIS own benifit, and lastly Two hundred THOUSAND innocent Iraqi's would still be alive. I guess they're lives don't mean crap to you,Oh Im sorry, Im putting words into your mouth again.

Whata Dope
psalover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 05:36 PM   #59
Master Collector
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Silver Spring, MD USA
Posts: 756
Default

You're kidding, right?
Criton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 06:02 PM   #60
Insane Collector
 
Hapag-Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 40
Posts: 2,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Criton View Post
You have no idea where I stand on practically any issue.
In the back of the short bus?
__________________
THIS SPACE 4 RENT!!!
Hapag-Lloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
Copyright © 1998 - 2008, DiecastAircraft.com & Wings900.com - All rights reserved
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

© 1997-2006 DiecastAircraftForum.com. This website, the content, the design and the pictures and are intended for public non commercial use, and may be redistributed, freely printed, or electronically reproduced in its complete and unaltered form provided distribution is for private use only. Partial and other distribution means require the permission of Wings900. All rights reserved.