DA.C - View Single Post

C-Rex · 03-07-2008, 02:17 PM

But isn't it a requirement or atleast a demand at everybody.?
If you don't resize, man I'm afraid that would need use alot of "free" storage.

IMHO we need to resize them as we do now. (to avoid to scroll hard right to view the hidden/missing part)
A photo of 364kb in 800pixel is preferred instead of 3450pixels in 4mb file size.
Again just my opinion. But I feel like I shouldn't say anything, cause I was the one who suggested a section for Spotting photos.
And the Spotting doesn't have anything "direct" relation to the models as a whole.

JP

03-07-2008, 02:17 PM	#3
C-Rex Registered User Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,275	Re: Storage capacity for attachments But isn't it a requirement or atleast a demand at everybody.? If you don't resize, man I'm afraid that would need use alot of "free" storage. IMHO we need to resize them as we do now. (to avoid to scroll hard right to view the hidden/missing part) A photo of 364kb in 800pixel is preferred instead of 3450pixels in 4mb file size. Again just my opinion. But I feel like I shouldn't say anything, cause I was the one who suggested a section for Spotting photos. And the Spotting doesn't have anything "direct" relation to the models as a whole. JP Last edited by C-Rex; 03-07-2008 at 02:20 PM.