DA.C - View Single Post - Qantas A300's

QFA388 · 02-20-2008, 04:35 AM

My observation of the models are this.
Both have good printing.
BBX (whatever) engine pylons are too short and cut off too far away from the front of the engine.
The flat stance of the BBx compared to the real nose down attitude an a real A300 is incorrect. BUT so is the Dragon version of the a300.

Therefore, in my eyes I can live with the engine pylon issue and as there are no AC vesions available without mortgaging the State of Alabama, I will happily have the BBx version to complete a set of QF A300s which sit in a display case.

02-20-2008, 04:35 AM	#24
QFA388 Buying only what I like Join Date: Jan 2007 Age: 47 Posts: 1,246	Re: Qantas A300's - A Comparison My observation of the models are this. Both have good printing. BBX (whatever) engine pylons are too short and cut off too far away from the front of the engine. The flat stance of the BBx compared to the real nose down attitude an a real A300 is incorrect. BUT so is the Dragon version of the a300. Therefore, in my eyes I can live with the engine pylon issue and as there are no AC vesions available without mortgaging the State of Alabama, I will happily have the BBx version to complete a set of QF A300s which sit in a display case.