Quote:
Originally Posted by Hapag-Lloyd
Considering this were true and we were talking about the same scientists - that would mean that if, say, a doctor was wrong like 10 years ago when he misdiagnosed you (he said it was a cold, but it turned out to be a sinusitis e.g.) you´d never trust any doctor again? Plus, you make a decision based on hearsay, and don´t even remember the scientist´s name who discredited his colleagues? You´re not the overly critical kind, are you?
Sorry, but I don´t buy it. This is not about scientists, it´s about complacency. As long as cheap oil provides a comfy ride in a comfy car, comfy electricity, and a comfy a/c, why bother worrying about all the downsides that come with that comfort. Denial is (again) the comfortable choice. Plus, as it seems right now, it´s the American choice.
|
Hapag:
I know we've gone over this again and again. You keep calling information questioning the validity of global warming theory as hearsay, yet in the past year, I know I've provided you with several citations from the scientific literature which dispute the pablum you are fed by the media. If there's any compalcency here, it's your reluctance to objectively evaluate the issue.