Springbok,
You make some interesting points, but I do have a couple questions. First in regards to commonality, the only benefit Airbus can offer is in terms of cockpit commonality. I don't believe there is a maintanance benefit between the airframe lines. Case in point, Delta, which disposed of the A310 aircraft because they were too expensive to maintain when compared to their Boeings.
As for cockpit commonality, I'd be interested to see a spreadsheet or report detailing the savings generated by an airline due to flight deck commonality. Not that I doubt there is a savings, I just think the impact is over-stated as far as narrowbody to widebody commonality.
I do admit the A319/A320 are fine aircraft and very comfortable. The A318 is a big questionmark for now and the A321 is an underpowered attempt at a B757 competitor, IMHO. The A330 and A340 are less than stellar performance-wise; poor climb-out and unimpressive cruise speeds.
I do have questions on the A320 series, also... Although they have the ability to use cargo containers, how many airlines consistently use them? Maybe some of our airline friends can help out on this one? I had heard (from a somewhat reliable source) that United does not use containers on their A319/A320's.
How about that fuselage diameter issue? I know the A320 is 6" wider inside, but I have also heard that the width gain is at ankle height and the 737 is actually wider at shoulder height. Anyone know more about this?
OK, I think that's it for now...
Steve
|