Old 11-26-2006, 12:53 PM   #1
El Chupacabra
 
gospodin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Age: 54
Posts: 5,069
Default VC-10 cut lines

Does anyone know why they have "cut here" in small blocks on the top of the fuselage of the GJ VC-10? It doesn't appear on photos of the real plane, or on any other models from DW or AC, only on a few GJ planes (this being one of them).
__________________
Steve







It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others...
gospodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 03:14 PM   #2
Where's my "avatar"?
 
Dr Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dr. Evil's secret lair
Posts: 526
Default

It is a British thing, you see it on some carriers from their (former) colonies also. It indicates spots on the fuselage where you can cut thru without the risk you encounter some wires or things.
__________________
"I'm surrounded by freakin' idiots..."
Dr Evil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 03:46 PM   #3
Setting The Pace
 
fazeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Age: 51
Posts: 2,993
Default

Yeah, the "cut here" blocks were placed there after the old James Bond production company cut through the wrong area for an intense escape scene in Her Majesty's Secret Service. They decided to do it fleetwide. It's a British thing.
__________________
Steve
fazeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 04:01 PM   #4
Everyone Is A Toaster!
 
L-1011-Heavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Cylon Colony, Eh? Trijets & Landors 4 EVER
Age: 47
Posts: 7,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Evil View Post
It is a British thing, you see it on some carriers from their (former) colonies also. It indicates spots on the fuselage where you can cut thru without the risk you encounter some wires or things.
Cripes Not Just Wires, But Structural Cross Sections! Cut Through That You Replace The Entire Cross Section/Plug!.
But Also I Think In The Event Of A Crash, It's Easier To Cut Through With Lighter Cutting Tools To Create An Emergency Escape Route.
__________________

My PORN Site

"In The Absence Of Excellence, There Is Only Mediocrity."
L-1011-Heavy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 04:24 PM   #5
El Chupacabra
 
gospodin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Age: 54
Posts: 5,069
Default

The emergency escape thing was what I was thinking, so that rescuers wouldn't encounter a crossmember, but all of the information was interesting. I didn't realize it was just on British planes, but not the modern ones, I've noticed. Thanks, guys.
__________________
Steve







It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others...
gospodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 06:23 PM   #6
Junior Collector
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 22
Default

You'll still see the four red L's at the corners of the 'cut here' section on most planes in the British Airways fleet to this day. On the Airbuses, they're around windows in between the doors, while Boeings have them in the roof section of the fuselage.
fv24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 06:44 PM   #7
El Chupacabra
 
gospodin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Age: 54
Posts: 5,069
Default

I only have three BA planes in my fleet...the Concorde, an ERJ-145 and the VC-10, so that's why I didn't see any others with the cut here marks. I have a BOAC VC-10 and the Comet, no cut marks on them.
__________________
Steve







It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others...
gospodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 07:56 PM   #8
Unlicensed Collector
 
waiping's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,367
Default

I am not sure the cut-here area would be effective in a crash.
__________________
Air Asia - NOT everyone can fly

My collection at: Waiping's Collection
waiping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 08:22 PM   #9
Jet Clipper "Benton" VTOL
 
silverbird707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: America
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waiping View Post
I am not sure the cut-here area would be effective in a crash.
Wow, with your knowledge maybe you should go and advise Boieng or Airbus
on saftey and aircraft construction.
__________________
Saturday mornings rocked!

silverbird707 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 09:16 PM   #10
Everyone Is A Toaster!
 
L-1011-Heavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Cylon Colony, Eh? Trijets & Landors 4 EVER
Age: 47
Posts: 7,022
Default

I Think He Means When An Aircraft Is Ripped To Pieces Or Burned To Nothing. There Are Times The Cut Lines Do Mean Nothing As In The Eastern Flight 401 Or
Value Jet 592.
I think The Operative Word Here Is Crash Land Whereby The Fuselage Is Still Intact Which Of Course Is Where The Cut Lines Are Necessary.
So Waiping Is Not Quite Correct, But I Get The Jist Of What He's Saying.
__________________

My PORN Site

"In The Absence Of Excellence, There Is Only Mediocrity."
L-1011-Heavy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 01:19 AM   #11
Unlicensed Collector
 
waiping's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L-1011-Heavy View Post
I Think He Means When An Aircraft Is Ripped To Pieces Or Burned To Nothing. There Are Times The Cut Lines Do Mean Nothing As In The Eastern Flight 401 Or
Value Jet 592.
I think The Operative Word Here Is Crash Land Whereby The Fuselage Is Still Intact Which Of Course Is Where The Cut Lines Are Necessary.
So Waiping Is Not Quite Correct, But I Get The Jist Of What He's Saying.
Exactly. From what I have noticed it's either the plane is in 1 piece - which does not warrant cutting through the fuselage, or there is no more fuselage to cut!

No need to be harsh Silverbird. I know you and I do not always share the same opinion but I do respect your opinions such as the one about special scheme on airliners.
__________________
Air Asia - NOT everyone can fly

My collection at: Waiping's Collection

Last edited by waiping; 11-27-2006 at 01:30 AM.
waiping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 01:42 AM   #12
Insane Collector
 
sammyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 36
Posts: 1,541
Default

Just because it might crash in one piece who is to say all areas are easily accessible? What if it breaks apart in two and one can't enter from the broken part of the fuselage or if someone is trapped somewhere?
sammyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 02:02 AM   #13
Unlicensed Collector
 
waiping's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammyk View Post
Just because it might crash in one piece who is to say all areas are easily accessible? What if it breaks apart in two and one can't enter from the broken part of the fuselage or if someone is trapped somewhere?
Interesting point. Has anyone came across situation whereby rescuers have to cut through the fuselage to get to the trapped passengers on time?
__________________
Air Asia - NOT everyone can fly

My collection at: Waiping's Collection
waiping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 03:23 AM   #14
Dr. Diecast I presume?
 
N. Eberhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,653
Default

I seriously doubt that the 'cut here' lines were used when the VC-10 was in service. But I could be wrong for the first time today.
N. Eberhard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 07:33 AM   #15
Junior Collector
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 22
Default

A quick search on Google found a bit more information about the 'Cut Here in Emergency' markings. They have been compulsory on all UK registered aircraft (and many Commonwealth countries too) at least since 1962, where the max weight is over 8,000 lbs.

A Civil Aviation Authority (the UK's equivalent of the US FAA) specification from 1962, tells us that:

"The position of the points should be such that in the event of a crash in which the final attitude of the aeroplane renders the normal and emergency exits useless for the rapid evacuation of trapped occupants, there will be for each passenger compartment at least one point in a position convenient for use."

and:

"The positioning and size of break-in points should be chosen so that an unobstructed entry into the passenger compartment can be made without the need to cut through any massive structural members, supply pipes, electric cables or internal fitments such as luggage racks. Ideally, the points should be chosen so that it is only necessary to cut through the skin, light structural members and the internal furnishing lining material."

Last edited by fv24; 11-27-2006 at 07:48 AM.
fv24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 08:03 AM   #16
Complete Wacko!
 
mjabbasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 7,752
Default

If I'm not mistaken, don't the B.Bird Saudia 741's and 743's also have them?
mjabbasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 10:57 AM   #17
Insane Collector
 
Don Clipper Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: At the airport of Amsterdam
Posts: 1,132
Default

I know Garuda, Cathay Pacific and Dragonair have them on their planes.
__________________
Pan American World Airways - the world's most experienced airline
Don Clipper Spirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 12:50 PM   #18
Dr. Diecast I presume?
 
N. Eberhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,653
Default

Interesting. So when was the VC10 removed from service by UK airlines?


Quote:
Originally Posted by fv24 View Post
A quick search on Google found a bit more information about the 'Cut Here in Emergency' markings. They have been compulsory on all UK registered aircraft (and many Commonwealth countries too) at least since 1962, where the max weight is over 8,000 lbs.

A Civil Aviation Authority (the UK's equivalent of the US FAA) specification from 1962, tells us that:

"The position of the points should be such that in the event of a crash in which the final attitude of the aeroplane renders the normal and emergency exits useless for the rapid evacuation of trapped occupants, there will be for each passenger compartment at least one point in a position convenient for use."

and:

"The positioning and size of break-in points should be chosen so that an unobstructed entry into the passenger compartment can be made without the need to cut through any massive structural members, supply pipes, electric cables or internal fitments such as luggage racks. Ideally, the points should be chosen so that it is only necessary to cut through the skin, light structural members and the internal furnishing lining material."
N. Eberhard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 01:34 PM   #19
Senior Collector
 
hkgdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Age: 60
Posts: 300
Default

Br.Caledonian 1974
Br.Airways (last Standard) 1979; (Supers) 1981
Dave
hkgdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 05:25 PM   #20
Junior Collector
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 22
Default

The marks are visible on the BCal VC-10 in this view, and also in this BOAC Super VC-10.
I find it amazing that AeroClassics didn't include them.
fv24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 06:32 PM   #21
Everyone Is A Toaster!
 
L-1011-Heavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Cylon Colony, Eh? Trijets & Landors 4 EVER
Age: 47
Posts: 7,022
Default

You Know Those Are BARELY Visible. As A Young Boy I Never Even Noticed The Cut Marks & Yes I Spotted The B-Cal & BOAC VC-10s Once In Heathrow & Many Times In Frankfurt. I Don't Mind They Are Not Included.
Matter Of Fact The Problem With Printing Those Marks In This Scale Is The Fact They are TOO Noticeable. This Is A Nitpick IMO.

But Did You Seec That Poor B-Cal? Her Back Is Broken...Very Sad....
__________________

My PORN Site

"In The Absence Of Excellence, There Is Only Mediocrity."
L-1011-Heavy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 01:28 AM   #22
Jet Clipper "Benton" VTOL
 
silverbird707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: America
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waiping View Post
Exactly. From what I have noticed it's either the plane is in 1 piece - which does not warrant cutting through the fuselage, or there is no more fuselage to cut!
No need to be harsh Silverbird. I know you and I do not always share the same opinion but I do respect your opinions such as the one about special scheme on airliners.
Well this is DAC "The Wild, Wild World of Diecast Collecting" where anything goes.

Some of these comments show a basic lack of understanding on aircraft structures, once again you might stop looking at airliners.net and go look at some real airplanes, read some material on aircraft structures, then you will see the reasoning (and the need) for "cut here" boxes and many other things.

Many many details are lost on a small model of 1/400 scale...it's almost like apples to oranges (1/400 to the real thing).
I have found a few of the "colorful" liveries somewhat interesting, but there's NO WAY any of them are worth $75 - $100....not for a little metal model.

Instead how about going and buying the Airframe/Powerplant FAA books
that have the answers to the questions posted here.
__________________
Saturday mornings rocked!


Last edited by silverbird707; 11-28-2006 at 11:47 AM.
silverbird707 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 04:44 AM   #23
Unlicensed Collector
 
waiping's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
Some of these comments show a basic lack of understanding on aircraft structures, once again you might stop looking at airliners.net and go look at some real airplanes, read some material on aircratf structures, then you will see the reasoning (and the need) for "cut here" boxes and many other things.
Huh, I thought airlines should follow guidelines set by the authority. Pictures are the real deal whereas books are just theories.

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
Many many details are lost on a small model of 1/400 scale...it's almost like apples to oranges (1/400 to the real thing).
I have found a few of the "colorful" liveries somewhat interesting, but there's NO WAY any of them are worth $75 - $100....not for a little metal model.
I would be a bit lenient and say it's like comparing an orange with mandarin lime. For me there's a lot of differences between an apple and an orange. For a start they both have the same scale! Of course some details might be lost that's why we judge individual manufacturer differently. Personally I would not spend more than a certain amount on a model. USD75 is a bit steep for me but it may not be for others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
Instead how about going and buying the Airframe/Powerplant FAA books that have the answers to the questions posted here.
I don't understand. Since books do not tally with airliners pictures, why read books that do not reflect true scenario?
__________________
Air Asia - NOT everyone can fly

My collection at: Waiping's Collection
waiping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 11:57 AM   #24
Jet Clipper "Benton" VTOL
 
silverbird707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: America
Posts: 200
Default

Huh, I thought airlines should follow guidelines set by the authority. Pictures are the real deal whereas books are just theories.

Wrong FAA books, maintenance manuals & structural manuals are NOT theory....shows you know zilch, and that's why you pose ridiculous questions and make uninformed statements.


I would be a bit lenient and say it's like comparing an orange with mandarin lime. For me there's a lot of differences between an apple and an orange.

Geez....you totally missed the point, not surprising!


I don't understand. Since books do not tally with airliners pictures, why read books that do not reflect true scenario?

OK then, don't read a book, instead look at Airliners.net, scratching your thick skull wondering gee....what's that for, it's not on my 1/400 model so it must not be right.

You can lead a horse to water......
__________________
Saturday mornings rocked!

silverbird707 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 01:12 PM   #25
Insane Collector
 
STEVEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Stony Brook, N.Y.
Posts: 1,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fv24 View Post
The marks are visible on the BCal VC-10 in this view, and also in this BOAC Super VC-10.
I find it amazing that AeroClassics didn't include them.
And lets not forget that AC charges $5.00 more to skip details like that.
STEVEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 02:38 PM   #26
Where's my "avatar"?
 
Dr Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dr. Evil's secret lair
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STEVEJ View Post
And lets not forget that AC charges $5.00 more to skip details like that.
Yeah, because Klink doesn't like blocked windows and cut here lines...
__________________
"I'm surrounded by freakin' idiots..."
Dr Evil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 04:29 PM   #27
Member
 
airParadigm.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Age: 24
Posts: 5,942
Default

Someone's quite bitter today...
airParadigm.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 05:12 PM   #28
Where's my "avatar"?
 
Dr Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dr. Evil's secret lair
Posts: 526
Default

Yeah... you right.

Still love that Gemini BA B747-400 with both on it. Adds a lot if you'd ask me.
__________________
"I'm surrounded by freakin' idiots..."
Dr Evil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 05:18 PM   #29
Member
 
airParadigm.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Age: 24
Posts: 5,942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Evil View Post
Yeah... you right.
Still love that Gemini BA B747-400 with both on it. Adds a lot if you'd ask me.
Well wasn't really refrencing to you more of a silver birdie that seems to be on a roll, but you can be bitter too. I still think that Garuda 747s should have No Cut Markings.
airParadigm.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 07:34 PM   #30
Unlicensed Collector
 
waiping's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
Wrong FAA books, maintenance manuals & structural manuals are NOT theory....shows you know zilch, and that's why you pose ridiculous questions and make uninformed statements.
I admit that I do not know much about planes. I am not here to teach people something that I do not know. If you know so much why don't you inform us. I am sure this would be useful info for everyone. Or you do not know the answer since you contradicted your own statement. First you say don't follow the pictures in a.net, then you say follow the pictures.

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
Geez....you totally missed the point, not surprising!
I agree I missed your point. Then again, what point are you referring to? Why some models have the "cut here" whereas other didn't bother to put them in? Quality issues, perhaps? Since it's a 1/400 scale model let's just omit this and that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
OK then, don't read a book, instead look at Airliners.net, scratching your thick skull wondering gee....what's that for, it's not on my 1/400 model so it must not be right.


You seems to be quite good at contradicting yourself, huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
You can lead a horse to water......
Don't worry, I don't have a S on my chest. What I can do you can too!
__________________
Air Asia - NOT everyone can fly

My collection at: Waiping's Collection
waiping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 07:44 PM   #31
Unlicensed Collector
 
waiping's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JB View Post
Well wasn't really refrencing to you more of a silver birdie that seems to be on a roll, but you can be bitter too. I still think that Garuda 747s should have No Cut Markings.
Maybe he's having his "period".
__________________
Air Asia - NOT everyone can fly

My collection at: Waiping's Collection
waiping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 11:20 PM   #32
El Chupacabra
 
gospodin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Age: 54
Posts: 5,069
Default

I was checking my fleet, and I noticed them on a Herpa United 777, so I guess it's not limited to the BA planes. All this info is great, I learn something new everytime I log in...
__________________
Steve







It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others...
gospodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2006, 01:17 AM   #33
Jet Clipper "Benton" VTOL
 
silverbird707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: America
Posts: 200
Default

Dac has gone to the dogs...or Junior Woodchucks
I give up trying to get a point across.....

Waiping....stay calm...don't move...I'll phone the authorities, seems a small town has lost their village idiot.
__________________
Saturday mornings rocked!

silverbird707 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2006, 01:29 AM   #34
Retro Junkie
 
psalover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: IN HELL!!!! Gotta Get Out!!!
Age: 39
Posts: 2,930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waiping View Post
Maybe he's having his "period".
Waiping,It seems we have a new N2272V on our hands. Whatever happened to good ol' Jim. I miss him with this guy posting .

Last edited by psalover; 11-29-2006 at 01:44 AM.
psalover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2006, 01:39 AM   #35
Unlicensed Collector
 
waiping's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
Dac has gone to the dogs...or Junior Woodchucks
I give up trying to get a point across.....

Waiping....stay calm...don't move...I'll phone the authorities, seems a small town has lost their village idiot.
I'll be here...the next tab is pointed to a.net.
__________________
Air Asia - NOT everyone can fly

My collection at: Waiping's Collection
waiping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2006, 02:29 AM   #36
Insane Collector
 
Don Clipper Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: At the airport of Amsterdam
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gospodin View Post
I was checking my fleet, and I noticed them on a Herpa United 777, so I guess it's not limited to the BA planes. All this info is great, I learn something new everytime I log in...
I am pretty sure that is a mistake from Herpa. IFAIK, UAL never had them on their planes.
__________________
Pan American World Airways - the world's most experienced airline
Don Clipper Spirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2006, 07:04 AM   #37
sometimes Zathras
 
dboyd001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: western NY
Posts: 1,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gospodin View Post
Does anyone know why they have "cut here" in small blocks on the top of the fuselage of the GJ VC-10? It doesn't appear on photos of the real plane, or on any other models from DW or AC, only on a few GJ planes (this being one of them).
.....I may be wrong, but I do remember some of these same markings on U.S. military planes.
Dave
dboyd001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 07:18 PM   #38
Junior Collector
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 19
Default Re: VC-10 cut lines

Quote:
Originally Posted by L-1011-Heavy View Post

But Did You Seec That Poor B-Cal? Her Back Is Broken...Very Sad....
Are you referring to G-ARTA, the VC10 prototype that was brought to service standard and sold to BCal as modelled by GJ? She was scrapped a few years after a heavy landing in which the spoilers were raised while the aircraft was still a few feet above the ground.

Joseph
JosephLalor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 09:06 PM   #39
Insane Collector
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,842
Default Re: VC-10 cut lines

Quote:
Originally Posted by gospodin View Post
I was checking my fleet, and I noticed them on a Herpa United 777, so I guess it's not limited to the BA planes. All this info is great, I learn something new everytime I log in...
Correct, some Qantas aircraft have them also.
It appears due to regulatory inconsistency, that no-one is right or wrong with their opinions.

Just depends on whether an airline wants their pax to survive or not
QFA388 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 09:22 PM   #40
*
 
David Hingtgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,726
Default Re: VC-10 cut lines

I prefer the markings to be left off. They're barely visible in real life--they shouldn't be obvious at 1/400.

Same for cargo doors. Door outlines are nearly invisible even from pretty close range in 1/1. Yet there's thick black lines at 1/400??????

Printing on subtle markings like that is like printing on each individual rivet---so small that they should be ignored at 1/72 scale, much less 1/200 or 1/400.
__________________
We need more TWA twin-stripes!
David Hingtgen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2007, 12:31 AM   #41
Aussie Icon
 
Groover158's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sale, Victoria (Home of the RAAF Roulettes)
Age: 45
Posts: 653
Default Re: VC-10 cut lines

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbird707 View Post
Waiping....stay calm...don't move...I'll phone the authorities, seems a small town has lost their village idiot.
Why would a town lose a village idiot? I suspect their response would be 'stay on the line silverbird; we'll send someone to come and get you'

I am sure we are all sooo impressed to have the likes of an 'expert' such as yourself visiting this humble forum. I know that I am beside myself as I bask in you truely superior knowledge of all things aeronautical. Perhaps you should include all of your post-nominals in your signature block so we can kneel down in front of our monitors.
__________________
________________________________________________


My Collection: http://www.diecastaircraftforum.com/...tion-4746.html

Groover158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 1998 - 2010, DiecastAircraft.com & Wings900.com - All rights reserved
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

© 1997-2006 DiecastAircraftForum.com. This website, the content, the design and the pictures and are intended for public non commercial use, and may be redistributed, freely printed, or electronically reproduced in its complete and unaltered form provided distribution is for private use only. Partial and other distribution means require the permission of Wings900. All rights reserved.