Mr. Klien - Page 6

cpal_747 · 04-24-2005, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklein707

The only thing I tried on Buzz was to tell the truth, only to receive a barage of personal attacks and insults for doing so. Get your facts straight!!
Banned or not banned, I wouldn't waste a moment of my precious time on a site which harbors the paraiahs of this hobby, and some of the biggest pricks n azzholes known to this world.
I enjoy life in the REAL WORLD; I don't need a buzzland menagerie to make my day!
Carry on!

Your memory seems very selective. The attacks were going both ways, and you had initiated at least half of them!

Your last statement "a site which harbors the paraiahs of this hobby, and some of the biggest pricks n azzholes known to this world" could easily describe 400SH(it) as well. Before making any more moronic statements, try looking in the mirror and realize that you are only talking about yourself most of the time!

JustPlaneCrazy · 04-24-2005, 02:57 PM

Same old s_hit, different day....

NCLairport · 04-24-2005, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Mud-From-Bum

I thought so

City, region, country ...

DavidMich · 04-24-2005, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOHN JOHNSON

Or he will dump jet fuel over you and lit you up, just like Bruce Wills.

Nope, not a fueler anymore John, I wrench on helicopters for the DoD now bud.

Quote:

Also his penis is known to be able to carry (sorta of like a fork-lifter) a Semi-Truck engine.

(No joke!) Be warned.

And I owe it all to Grandmaster Tu's Iron Crotch-99 Power Practice training program!

http://www.airlinebuzz.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=16239

aklein707 · 04-24-2005, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpal_747

Your memory seems very selective. The attacks were going both ways, and you had initiated at least half of them!

Your last statement "a site which harbors the paraiahs of this hobby, and some of the biggest pricks n azzholes known to this world" could easily describe 400SH(it) as well. Before making any more moronic statements, try looking in the mirror and realize that you are only talking about yourself most of the time!

Posts from COWARDS/MORONS hiding behind phoney aliases are of no consequence;
Carry on!

By the way putz, I just went to Buzzland for a look-see and this caught my eye;

QUOTE
WTF is Andrew smokin'???

--------------------------------------------------------

This is BS...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...6527049491&rd=1

Not historically correct, and not even a Braniff colour!

(Even you're are going to defy The Braniff Trust...at least do it right AC!)
UNQUOTE

We all know that Brook Watts is a slithering scumbag, but considering I haven't bothered to look on the buzzardboard for months, and on first glance today I find this, I think we all know why I think of some buzzards the way that I do, and QUITE RIGHTLY SO!! So the next time you're referred to as pricks and asssholes, ask YOURSELVES why, and look in your own fukking mirrors!

And speaking of defying the Braniff Trust, I beleive the only entity I've defied is B.Watts and his attempted extortion scheme, which explains his attutude towards me for failing to capitulate;
Carry on!

shades of blue · 04-24-2005, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklein707

Posts from COWARDS/MORONS hiding behind phoney aliases are of no consequence;
Carry on!

By the way putz, I just went to Buzzland for a look-see and this caught my eye;

QUOTE
WTF is Andrew smokin'???

--------------------------------------------------------

This is BS...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...6527049491&rd=1

Not historically correct, and not even a Braniff colour!

(Even you're are going to defy The Braniff Trust...at least do it right AC!)
UNQUOTE

We all know that Brook Watts is a slithering scumbag, but considering I haven't bothered to look on the buzzardboard for months, and on first glance today I find this, I think we all know why I think of some buzzards the way that I do, and QUITE RIGHTLY SO!! So the next time you're referred to as pricks and asssholes, ask YOURSELVES why, and look in your own fukking mirrors!

And speaking of defying the Braniff Trust, I beleive the only entity I've defied is B.Watts and his attempted extortion scheme, which explains his attutude towards me for failing to capitulate;
Carry on!

And if you had bothered to read the rest of that thread, you would have seen that others clearly identified the model in question as a custom, and not your work. So stop trying to stir the pot by providing only half the story.

cpal_747 · 04-24-2005, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustPlaneCrazy

Same old s_hit, different day....

Thankfully your insightful and witty posts are here for us to peruse! Way to go Comrade!

cpal_747 · 04-24-2005, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklein707

Posts from COWARDS/MORONS hiding behind phoney aliases are of no consequence;
Carry on!

By the way putz, I just went to Buzzland for a look-see and this caught my eye;

QUOTE
WTF is Andrew smokin'???

--------------------------------------------------------

This is BS...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...6527049491&rd=1

Not historically correct, and not even a Braniff colour!

(Even you're are going to defy The Braniff Trust...at least do it right AC!)
UNQUOTE

We all know that Brook Watts is a slithering scumbag, but considering I haven't bothered to look on the buzzardboard for months, and on first glance today I find this, I think we all know why I think of some buzzards the way that I do, and QUITE RIGHTLY SO!! So the next time you're referred to as pricks and asssholes, ask YOURSELVES why, and look in your own fukking mirrors!

And speaking of defying the Braniff Trust, I beleive the only entity I've defied is B.Watts and his attempted extortion scheme, which explains his attutude towards me for failing to capitulate;
Carry on!

Way to not read the entire post, once again your selective quoting distorts the story. It was clearly stated in the post that it was a custom. But don't let that stop you attacking Brook, since your Braniff models aren't licensed, who is the real slithering scumbag?

JOHN JOHNSON · 04-24-2005, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpal_747

Way to not read the entire post, once again your selective quoting distorts the story. It was clearly stated in the post that it was a custom. But don't let that stop you attacking Brook, since your Braniff models aren't licensed, who is the real slithering scumbag?

Blah. Why don't we see L-1011, DC-10, and MD-11 in Braniff livery?

So Hoo care 'bout license-crap?

Hey, Anyone have a gut to do Delta 1996 Olymplic 767-200 to keep my lonely MD-11, a happy camper, to sleep with every night?

crownvic · 04-24-2005, 06:47 PM

Andrew I totally forgot it was Passover, so yes I will ask all the questions and eat in a relaxed position.. By the way, is this the one where I light the minorah and the candles or is that Chanukah?????

Flying Ace · 04-24-2005, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustPlaneCrazy

Same old s_hit, different day....

Not getting any these days heh?

LIfe can be a real bummer for some!

Galapagapop · 04-24-2005, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galapagapop

Thats because most TV stations do not have the equipment to do HD signals. Even on some sports networks there is no HD signal because up until earlier this year most networks that did sports games used a graphics system that could only do one or the other. So networks bought 2 systems and had to sperate programming carfully as not interfere with HD and non HD commercials and shows. This year a new system (Wish I could remember the name!) came out and is slowly being put to use in baseball games, and will be commonplace in 5 years (good seeing as the old system came out in 1992). Its a more advance system that has better graphics abilities and is able to combine HD and Non-HD signals. Not to mention it can broadcast HD signal at more than 720P. And right now most people don't understand they need to get their new boxes from their cable companies as most think their old one can broadcast HD.

Cheers!

Just to finish this off the old system was called infini and the new one is called Duet(makes sense actually)

Cheers!

Chief Mud-From-Bum · 04-24-2005, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crownvic

Andrew I totally forgot it was Passover, so yes I will ask all the questions and eat in a relaxed position.. By the way, is this the one where I light the minorah and the candles or is that Chanukah?????

I think it's the one where ya get circumcised.

goldy · 04-25-2005, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Mud-From-Bum

I think it's the one where ya get circumcised.

Yeah, I did that once. It was not a pleasant thing so I think that is the last time I will try that.

Goldy

aklein707 · 04-25-2005, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpal_747

Way to not read the entire post, once again your selective quoting distorts the story. It was clearly stated in the post that it was a custom. But don't let that stop you attacking Brook, since your Braniff models aren't licensed, who is the real slithering scumbag?

When slithering scumbags start inflamatory posts, without even checking into the facts first (kinda like the

SMACboyz

launching frivilous lawsuits without any regard to fact), then the responses given are indeed appropriate, and warranted.
Braniff license for the models I've produced in past is NOT REQUIRED. Of course Brook knew that, which is why he resents me for refusing to sucumb to his attempted extortion scheme.
Now when a moronic prick like you continues to fight an unwinable arguement, his stupidity shows through very clearly;
Carry on!

Tracon Doug · 04-25-2005, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklein707

When slithering scumbags start inflamatory posts, without even checking into the facts first (kinda like the

SMACboyz

launching frivilous lawsuits without any regard to fact), then the responses given are indeed appropriate, and warranted.
Braniff license for the models I've produced in past is NOT REQUIRED. Of course Brook knew that, which is why he resents me for refusing to sucumb to his attempted extortion scheme.
Now when a moronic prick like you continues to fight an unwinable arguement, his stupidity shows through very clearly;
Carry on!

blah blah blah..... yada yada yada.....

Chief Mud-From-Bum · 04-25-2005, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldy

Yeah, I did that once. It was not a pleasant thing so I think that is the last time I will try that.

Goldy

Remember: measure twice, cut once

JOHN JOHNSON · 04-25-2005, 01:41 AM

For beginning.....

http://www.diecastaircraftforum.com/...388#post409388

TK-421 · 04-25-2005, 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NCLairport

You chaps are either men or not, can I recommend that you do not type instantly after you've read a message - take your time, think about your response and then say something constructive.

I think you should all get together, have a group hug and forget about all this madness!

Mike

Hi Mike,
You've got the right idea.
I think you'll be fine reading between the lines.
Love 1:400 BTW.
Trent

cpal_747 · 04-25-2005, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklein707

When slithering scumbags start inflamatory posts, without even checking into the facts first (kinda like the

SMACboyz

launching frivilous lawsuits without any regard to fact), then the responses given are indeed appropriate, and warranted.
Braniff license for the models I've produced in past is NOT REQUIRED. Of course Brook knew that, which is why he resents me for refusing to sucumb to his attempted extortion scheme.
Now when a moronic prick like you continues to fight an unwinable arguement, his stupidity shows through very clearly;
Carry on!

So are you saying that your models are unlicensed and that is fine. Yet when Big bird finally produces the long awaited landor and red tail BA 747's, you freak and tell them to shut down because those models are unlicensed. Do you ever get confused with this double standard that you seem to live?

If the argument is so unwinnable as you like to claim, why do you always have to respond with such vehemence. Methinks thou dost protest too much!

goldy · 04-25-2005, 09:46 PM

The BA Landor's were in the production schedule before the end of the year. The new BB management opted to keep to the schedule and go ahead and release them even though the new management opposed the release. In other words, the new BB did not want to release the BA but were obligated to the factory to do so. This oppostion because of BB's new management had a gentleman's agreement with Gemini that there would be no more production of BA models.

Klein had something to do with it but not as much as you give him credit for and his motives were for the right reasons anyway. Because the BB products, as you know, come from his factory in China he did have a right to express his displeasure over their release.

But why all of this concern of license and non license? It is a topic that will be around for ever. Nothing will come of the dicussion be it pro or con so why discuss it? Half of the models that I buy I don't know if they are licensed or not. And like I ask all of the time, are those licensed models sold to us by unlicensed retailers? Do we seem to care about that? So what difference does it make?

Goldy

Hapag-Lloyd · 04-26-2005, 03:40 AM

Is there also a "gentleman´s agreement" around with Herpa Wings not to produce any more unlicensed CX models? Because, due to cost distribution, a minor fraction of the CX licensing costs will very likely be slapped on top of each Herpa model, CX or not. That way, the cost factories save on unlicensed models is being drawn out of my wallet.

L-1011-Heavy · 04-26-2005, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hapag-Lloyd

Is there also a "gentleman´s agreement" around with Herpa Wings not to produce any more unlicensed CX models? Because, due to cost distribution, a minor fraction of the CX licensing costs will very likely be slapped on top of ea

04-24-2005, 06:47 PM	#260
crownvic Junior Miss City of Orlando Join Date: Jun 1999 Location: Orlando FL Posts: 3,080	Andrew I totally forgot it was Passover, so yes I will ask all the questions and eat in a relaxed position.. By the way, is this the one where I light the minorah and the candles or is that Chanukah????? __________________ *SOON CELEBRATING 50 YEARS OF CONTINUOUS STUPIDITY AND STILL FOLLOWING NOT LEADING* "Hey Andy, unless we get some Police Package Crown Victorias, I'm quitting, and you can have your bullet back!" And yes, I did do Aunt Bea,,,she was great!

04-25-2005, 01:41 AM	#268
JOHN JOHNSON Mysterious Collector Join Date: Sep 2000 Posts: 4,196	Look at "Off Topic" section as there is few free money being offer from big retailers For beginning..... http://www.diecastaircraftforum.com/...388#post409388 __________________ Who should I consider? Dumbocrat Clinton or Ruptublican Johnny Mc Cain? Jimmy Mc Donald Help me!

04-26-2005, 03:40 AM	#272
Hapag-Lloyd Insane Collector Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 2,291	Is there also a "gentleman´s agreement" around with Herpa Wings not to produce any more unlicensed CX models? Because, due to cost distribution, a minor fraction of the CX licensing costs will very likely be slapped on top of each Herpa model, CX or not. That way, the cost factories save on unlicensed models is being drawn out of my wallet. __________________ THIS SPACE 4 RENT!!! Last edited by Hapag-Lloyd; 04-26-2005 at 03:43 AM.

04-24-2005, 02:57 PM	#252
JustPlaneCrazy DieCast WatchDog Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 3,305	Same old s_hit, different day....

04-25-2005, 09:46 PM	#271
goldy Complete Wacko! Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 3,573	The BA Landor's were in the production schedule before the end of the year. The new BB management opted to keep to the schedule and go ahead and release them even though the new management opposed the release. In other words, the new BB did not want to release the BA but were obligated to the factory to do so. This oppostion because of BB's new management had a gentleman's agreement with Gemini that there would be no more production of BA models. Klein had something to do with it but not as much as you give him credit for and his motives were for the right reasons anyway. Because the BB products, as you know, come from his factory in China he did have a right to express his displeasure over their release. But why all of this concern of license and non license? It is a topic that will be around for ever. Nothing will come of the dicussion be it pro or con so why discuss it? Half of the models that I buy I don't know if they are licensed or not. And like I ask all of the time, are those licensed models sold to us by unlicensed retailers? Do we seem to care about that? So what difference does it make? Goldy