Did you notice the upgraded dragon wing models

kanesh330 · 04-10-2005, 08:58 AM

the Upgraded dragon wing models e.g A345-500 has the horizontal slivery line which i dont know what it is called.....is is realy foud on the real plane,i think it is cool what do you think...can you also please tell me what it is ....thank you for replying.

jjorgemiami · 04-10-2005, 09:52 PM

".....horizontal slivery line...." WTF???? Can you give us a little more to go on? How about a picture?

aklein707 · 04-10-2005, 10:36 PM

I've seen no improvement on DW lately; regression yes, improvement, no!

Ansett Australia · 04-10-2005, 11:23 PM

What horizontal silvery line? Where? Which part?

Chief Mud-From-Bum · 04-10-2005, 11:52 PM

Yeah, slivery...You know, as in "I would like just a slivery of that pumpkiny pie"

kl729 · 04-11-2005, 09:11 AM

The only improvement I noticed is the correct outline where the wings are attached under the belly. This is the correct representation on all airbuses. It used to be only GJ who has the correct mould. DW now has the similar mould for their new SQ A345 but that part of the belly is plastic which makes the model a lot lighter.

cpal_747 · 04-11-2005, 02:52 PM

Probably the best upgraded Dragon would have to be their Boeing 377 mould. The first one was a little rough to say the least, but if you have picked up the "officially licensed" Pan Am Stratocruiser, it is a wonderful model. Dragon are often accused of doing nothing, but when they take the lead and make a great new mould, they still get bashed. I guess you can have it both ways.

Boeing SST · 04-12-2005, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpal_747

Probably the best upgraded Dragon would have to be their Boeing 377 mould. The first one was a little rough to say the least, but if you have picked up the "officially licensed" Pan Am Stratocruiser, it is a wonderful model. Dragon are often accused of doing nothing, but when they take the lead and make a great new mould, they still get bashed. I guess you can have it both ways.

Im waiting for the PAA Strat and looking forward to the rear stab improvement....and yes, there is plenty of jealousy when DW takes the lead. They are still the number one mfg of choice (for me).

N2272V · 04-12-2005, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boeing SST

Im waiting for the PAA Strat and looking forward to the rear stab improvement....and yes, there is plenty of jealousy when DW takes the lead. They are still the number one mfg of choice (for me).

....is FUNNY. I know you are entitled to your opinion on this matter. But it really was funny to read this.

Carry on!

justin · 04-12-2005, 12:04 PM

If the C5 Galaxy is the sign of a model company in decline then DW's older models must have been more than perfect

Along with the Herpa A340-500/600 I'd rate the C5 as the best mould currently available in 1/400, and the revised B377 is superb,

Justin

aklein707 · 04-12-2005, 02:07 PM

Justin, you and Herb have shown undying loyalty towards DW for many years. I commend you on that trait; loyalty is hard to find anywhere these days.
I just happen to be of the opinion that their models are sub-par, and not "collectable". There are a few exceptions, notibly their C-5, B-29, MD-80, MD-11, & DC-10.

But this is just a hobby, so I wish those like you and Herb, all the joys of collecting DW, as much as I enjoy collecting GJ, Herpa, AC, & BB.

Boeing SST · 04-12-2005, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by N2272V

....is FUNNY. I know you are entitled to your opinion on this matter. But it really was funny to read this.

Carry on!

I was amused by your response as well.

N2272V · 04-12-2005, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklein707

Justin, you and Herb have shown undying loyalty towards DW for many years. I commend you on that trait; loyalty is hard to find anywhere these days.
I just happen to be of the opinion that their models are sub-par, and not "collectable". There are a few exceptions, notibly their C-5, B-29, MD-80, MD-11, & DC-10.

But this is just a hobby, so I wish those like you and Herb, all the joys of collecting DW, as much as I enjoy collecting GJ, Herpa, AC, & BB.

Is the DW B-29 worth getting? If so, I'll be all over it.

aklein707 · 04-12-2005, 07:34 PM

I will always give credit when due, and I thought the DW B-29 was a fine effort, so much so, I purchased one.

justin · 04-13-2005, 07:54 AM

I am indeed a DW supporter

I would never claim they were perfect though, they've made a fair few stinkers over the years, the first generation Airbus models were less than great, the Westjet 737-200 a total stinker that was just aweful and the connie let down by the worst landing gear ever seen in 1/400. However they've also made some superb models and when they get it right they get it very right, their MD8X,MD11 and DC10 moulds are old now but still as good as almost anything in the scale and the C5 just fabulous, they've also made some wonderful military models like the military 707 variants. No company in the hobby has either a monoploly on stinkers or diamonds and I just think DW deserve much more recognition for the great models they've made,

Justin

Boeing SST · 04-13-2005, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justin

I am indeed a DW supporter

I would never claim they were perfect though, they've made a fair few stinkers over the years, the first generation Airbus models were less than great, the Westjet 737-200 a total stinker that was just aweful and the connie let down by the worst landing gear ever seen in 1/400. However they've also made some superb models and when they get it right they get it very right, their MD8X,MD11 and DC10 moulds are old now but still as good as almost anything in the scale and the C5 just fabulous, they've also made some wonderful military models like the military 707 variants. No company in the hobby has either a monoploly on stinkers or diamonds and I just think DW deserve much more recognition for the great models they've made,

Justin

ditto. Couldnt agree more.

L-1011-Heavy · 04-14-2005, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kl729

The only improvement I noticed is the correct outline where the wings are attached under the belly. This is the correct representation on all airbuses. It used to be only GJ who has the correct mould. DW now has the similar mould for their new SQ A345 but that part of the belly is plastic which makes the model a lot lighter.

I Believe You Are Talking About The Fairings At The Wingroot. None Of The Narrowbodies, A-300 Or 310 Have This.
Also The A-300 Or 310 Do Not Have A "WingBox" On The Underbelly.

L-1011-Heavy · 04-14-2005, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justin

I am indeed a DW supporter

I would never claim they were perfect though, they've made a fair few stinkers over the years, the first generation Airbus models were less than great, the Westjet 737-200 a total stinker that was just aweful and the connie let down by the worst landing gear ever seen in 1/400. However they've also made some superb models and when they get it right they get it very right, their MD8X,MD11 and DC10 moulds are old now but still as good as almost anything in the scale and the C5 just fabulous, they've also made some wonderful military models like the military 707 variants. No company in the hobby has either a monoploly on stinkers or diamonds and I just think DW deserve much more recognition for the great models they've made,

Justin

[b]WHAT HE SAID...ONLY BIGGER!!!

Currently Aeroclassics, Big Bird, Sovereign, & SMA Are My Fave, But DW Is Still Tops In My Books. Although They Make A Lot Of Disappointing Stuff Of Late. Many Of Thier Models Are Superb, But NO ONE Comes Close To Thier DC-10 Or L-1011!

Check This Pic I Took Of DW Phillipines! No Model To Date Looks This Real!.

L-1011-Heavy · 04-14-2005, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklein707

Justin, you and Herb have shown undying loyalty towards DW for many years. I commend you on that trait; loyalty is hard to find anywhere these days.
I just happen to be of the opinion that their models are sub-par, and not "collectable". There are a few exceptions, notibly their C-5, B-29, MD-80, MD-11, & DC-10.

But this is just a hobby, so I wish those like you and Herb, all the joys of collecting DW, as much as I enjoy collecting GJ, Herpa, AC, & BB.

I Don't Often Reply To Your Threads, Andrew But This One Is Very Deserving.
Loyalty Comes From Quality. I Am A Die Hard Fan Of Your Models As I Am With DW, Big Bird, Aurora, Green Box, And Dare I Say It...SMA ( Which I Believe You Were Responsible For Thier 737)

Loyalty Is A Two Way Street, And Your Models Are Deserving Of Loyalty. Just A Few Short Years Ago I Merely Dreamed Of Many Models That I Thought That Would NEVER Be Produced. But Thanks To You Many Of Them Have Come To Fruition. What Comes Immediately To Mind Are The 3-Reeve L-188s And 2-727s, A Whole Bunch Of 767s, All The CP-Air 37 & 27s, And Near 30 Other Propliners.And Of Course an EL AL 747 (I Bought All Six!)
My Knees Knock Everytime I Anticipate New Releases From You. Though Many
Dragon Models Are Excellent, The Past Year Has Been Very Dissappointing From Them And I No Longer Get That same Feeling When I Look On Thier Website.
Keep On Truckin' (Moulding!)

____HEAVY____

N2272V · 04-15-2005, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-1011-Heavy

I Don't Often Reply To Your Threads, Andrew But This One Is Very Deserving.
Loyalty Comes From Quality. I Am A Die Hard Fan Of Your Models As I Am With DW, Big Bird, Aurora, Green Box, And Dare I Say It...SMA ( Which I Believe You Were Responsible For Thier 737)

Loyalty Is A Two Way Street, And Your Models Are Deserving Of Loyalty. Just A Few Short Years Ago I Merely Dreamed Of Many Models That I Thought That Would NEVER Be Produced. But Thanks To You Many Of Them Have Come To Fruition. What Comes Immediately To Mind Are The 3-Reeve L-188s And 2-727s, A Whole Bunch Of 767s, All The CP-Air 37 & 27s, And Near 30 Other Propliners.And Of Course an EL AL 747 (I Bought All Six!)
My Knees Knock Everytime I Anticipate New Releases From You. Though Many
Dragon Models Are Excellent, The Past Year Has Been Very Dissappointing From Them And I No Longer Get That same Feeling When I Look On Thier Website.
Keep On Truckin' (Moulding!)

Yeah my knees do the same thing. Only it is from the fear of having to shell out the bucks and then take the beating my wife gives every month she see's my care package from AeroClassics. I mean I am not complaining so much but I think Andrew needs MORE time off!

L-1011-Heavy · 04-15-2005, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by N2272V

Only it is from the fear of having to shell out the bucks and then take the beating my wife gives every month she see's my care package from AeroClassics.

That's A Separate Issue For Me. There Is Usually A Scramble, Beg, Borrow, Steal(Not, He He

) Bank Loan, Bonus, Credit Card, Debit When The New Stuff Comes Out.
I'm Talking About Knee Knocking Everytime I Check 400 SH Or Other Possible Sources For Leaks Of New releases(Daily Basis) For The Newest Releases, Hoping It's a Ton Of Stuff I've Been waiting For.

kanesh330 · 04-15-2005, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by N2272V

Yeah my knees do the same thing. Only it is from the fear of having to shell out the bucks and then take the beating my wife gives every month she see's my care package from AeroClassics. I mean I am not complaining so much but I think Andrew needs MORE time off!

who cares if bush won???It was soo long ago,why you people talk about person who cannot play catching so well you noe what i mean???

N2272V · 04-15-2005, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kanesh330

who cares if bush won???It was soo long ago,why you people talk about person who cannot play catching so well you noe what i mean???

Okay, realizing that English is NOT your first language. How is three and a half months a LONG time ago?

As for playing catch, I'll get back to you on that one, I am still scratching my head about it.

Carry on!

kanesh330 · 04-15-2005, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by N2272V

Okay, realizing that English is NOT your first language. How is three and a half months a LONG time ago?

As for playing catch, I'll get back to you on that one, I am still scratching my head about it.

Carry on!

yo uncle i wouldent be writing to you in the first place if english wasn't my first language you brainless creature...any way stop scratchin and apply some shampoo ok creature..people this creature is the first to use shampoooo!!!

04-10-2005, 08:58 AM	#1
kanesh330 PROFESSIONAL COLLECTOR Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: singapore Age: 16 Posts: 52	Did you notice the upgraded dragon wing models the Upgraded dragon wing models e.g A345-500 has the horizontal slivery line which i dont know what it is called.....is is realy foud on the real plane,i think it is cool what do you think...can you also please tell me what it is ....thank you for replying.

04-10-2005, 09:52 PM	#2
jjorgemiami Complete Wacko! Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: MIAMI Age: 47 Posts: 5,458	".....horizontal slivery line...." WTF???? Can you give us a little more to go on? How about a picture? __________________ Fly United Airlines we are R I S I N G !

04-10-2005, 10:36 PM	#3
aklein707 Complete Wacko! Join Date: Jul 1999 Location: Sanya, Hainan, People's Republic of China Posts: 3,592	I've seen no improvement on DW lately; regression yes, improvement, no! __________________ Enjoying aviation from a "TSA-free Zone"!! Take the money-grab & deceit out of our hobby, and bring back ethics and quality!! Just say NO to BluNutz/Junk-X/First Choice/C&C/IF400/AV400/Magic/5stars & any Big Birds (real or fake)

04-10-2005, 11:23 PM	#4
Ansett Australia Senior Collector Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Malaysia Posts: 229	What horizontal silvery line? Where? Which part? __________________ Ansett Australia: The legend of the Australian skies continues.....

04-11-2005, 02:52 PM	#7
cpal_747 Mission Accomplished! Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 750	Probably the best upgraded Dragon would have to be their Boeing 377 mould. The first one was a little rough to say the least, but if you have picked up the "officially licensed" Pan Am Stratocruiser, it is a wonderful model. Dragon are often accused of doing nothing, but when they take the lead and make a great new mould, they still get bashed. I guess you can have it both ways. __________________ They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. - Ben Franklin

04-10-2005, 11:52 PM	#5
Chief Mud-From-Bum Seriously Demented Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Neverland Ranch Posts: 107	Yeah, slivery...You know, as in "I would like just a slivery of that pumpkiny pie"

04-11-2005, 09:11 AM	#6
kl729 Insane Collector Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Melbourne VIC Australia Posts: 1,139	The only improvement I noticed is the correct outline where the wings are attached under the belly. This is the correct representation on all airbuses. It used to be only GJ who has the correct mould. DW now has the similar mould for their new SQ A345 but that part of the belly is plastic which makes the model a lot lighter.

04-12-2005, 12:04 PM	#10
justin Insane Collector Join Date: Feb 2000 Posts: 2,005	If the C5 Galaxy is the sign of a model company in decline then DW's older models must have been more than perfect Along with the Herpa A340-500/600 I'd rate the C5 as the best mould currently available in 1/400, and the revised B377 is superb, Justin

04-12-2005, 02:07 PM	#11
aklein707 Complete Wacko! Join Date: Jul 1999 Location: Sanya, Hainan, People's Republic of China Posts: 3,592	Justin, you and Herb have shown undying loyalty towards DW for many years. I commend you on that trait; loyalty is hard to find anywhere these days. I just happen to be of the opinion that their models are sub-par, and not "collectable". There are a few exceptions, notibly their C-5, B-29, MD-80, MD-11, & DC-10. But this is just a hobby, so I wish those like you and Herb, all the joys of collecting DW, as much as I enjoy collecting GJ, Herpa, AC, & BB. __________________ Enjoying aviation from a "TSA-free Zone"!! Take the money-grab & deceit out of our hobby, and bring back ethics and quality!! Just say NO to BluNutz/Junk-X/First Choice/C&C/IF400/AV400/Magic/5stars & any Big Birds (real or fake)

04-12-2005, 07:34 PM	#14
aklein707 Complete Wacko! Join Date: Jul 1999 Location: Sanya, Hainan, People's Republic of China Posts: 3,592	I will always give credit when due, and I thought the DW B-29 was a fine effort, so much so, I purchased one. __________________ Enjoying aviation from a "TSA-free Zone"!! Take the money-grab & deceit out of our hobby, and bring back ethics and quality!! Just say NO to BluNutz/Junk-X/First Choice/C&C/IF400/AV400/Magic/5stars & any Big Birds (real or fake)

04-13-2005, 07:54 AM	#15
justin Insane Collector Join Date: Feb 2000 Posts: 2,005	I am indeed a DW supporter I would never claim they were perfect though, they've made a fair few stinkers over the years, the first generation Airbus models were less than great, the Westjet 737-200 a total stinker that was just aweful and the connie let down by the worst landing gear ever seen in 1/400. However they've also made some superb models and when they get it right they get it very right, their MD8X,MD11 and DC10 moulds are old now but still as good as almost anything in the scale and the C5 just fabulous, they've also made some wonderful military models like the military 707 variants. No company in the hobby has either a monoploly on stinkers or diamonds and I just think DW deserve much more recognition for the great models they've made, Justin