Links Sponsored by Waffle Collectibles

Go Back   DA.C > Local Control > 1:1 Scale Military Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-12-2010, 07:32 PM   #1
addicted
 
champpitbull2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 763
Default The F-22

Maybe they should rethink closing that F-22 line.
Pentagon's future fighter aircraft doubles in cost - CNN.com
champpitbull2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2010, 10:18 PM   #2
Northwest/Delta collector
 
Boeing 787 fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Burnsville Minnesota
Age: 18
Posts: 129
Default Re: The F-22

If and I mean If the F-22 line comes back on line what will the marines and the navy get a modified F-22?
Boeing 787 fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 10:49 AM   #3
El Chupacabra
 
gospodin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Age: 54
Posts: 4,961
Default Re: The F-22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boeing 787 fan View Post
If and I mean If the F-22 line comes back on line what will the marines and the navy get a modified F-22?
There was never a Navy version planned, and definitely no VTOL version ever mentioned.
__________________
Steve







It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others...
gospodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 12:34 PM   #4
Delta Collector
 
N708DN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Age: 18
Posts: 107
Default Re: The F-22

Quote:
Originally Posted by gospodin View Post
There was never a Navy version planned, and definitely no VTOL version ever mentioned.
Actually there was once a a navalised F-22 in the planning books but it got scrubbed by the F/A-18 Super Hornet but who knows now it may come back to life because of the F-35 JSF getting more expensive then the F-22
N708DN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 01:36 PM   #5
Master Collector
 
SuperKungFu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 630
Default Re: The F-22

Yea I remember reading about the F-22B or F-22X which was meant for the NAVY but it never got off the drawing boards...these were like the early concepts:

__________________
SuperKungFu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 01:43 PM   #6
Insane Collector
 
airplanenut5588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vashon, WA/Renton, WA
Posts: 1,445
Default Re: The F-22

Lockheed should be penalized for this. The whole logic of stopping F-22 production was that the F-35 was going to be cheaper. Except or the VTOL version, the F- 35 is a less capable fighter aircraft then the F-22 especially in terms of aerial combat. I think that the Air Force should tell Lockheed to go do something with itself and buy F-22s instead. I know its never going to happen as it would make the F-35 even more expensive.
__________________
My mom says I'm addicted to models. I just tell her there are worse vices out there!



CURRENT 1/200 AIRLINER COLLECTION

OTHER/FORMER MODELS
airplanenut5588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 02:22 PM   #7
Master Collector
 
SuperKungFu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 630
Default Re: The F-22

It seems to me this happens....ALL THE TIME...when politics gets involved. As soon as we start cutting numbers of a particular aircraft being produced, the price of each plane jumps. Remember the B-2? Originally we were planning to build 200 of those bad boys, but we got around to 20, and the price jumped to 1.3 billion each. Same thing with the F-22, and now the F-35.
__________________
SuperKungFu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 02:29 PM   #8
Delta Collector
 
N708DN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Age: 18
Posts: 107
Default Re: The F-22

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperKungFu View Post
It seems to me this happens....ALL THE TIME...when politics gets involved. As soon as we start cutting numbers of a particular aircraft being produced, the price of each plane jumps. Remember the B-2? Originally we were planning to build 200 of those bad boys, but we got around to 20, and the price jumped to 1.3 billion each. Same thing with the F-22, and now the F-35.
It's kinda depressing isn't it, and it seems that since WWII we've lost focus of our military the last great plane we built was The BUFF (aka B-52)
N708DN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 09:38 PM   #9
Also known as "usairfan"
 
b747dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 199
Default Re: The F-22

Quote:
Originally Posted by N708DN View Post
It's kinda depressing isn't it, and it seems that since WWII we've lost focus of our military the last great plane we built was The BUFF (aka B-52)
I think the F-14 was a pretty nice a/c also. I heard it was retired because of the air fame and the Phoenix missile was retired?
__________________
b747dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 10:05 PM   #10
Master Collector
 
SuperKungFu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 630
Default Re: The F-22

The F-14 was retired because the maintaining the aircraft became too costly. Especially that swing-wing design, so the hornet now carries on the torch.
__________________
SuperKungFu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2010, 11:01 PM   #11
Delta Collector
 
N708DN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Age: 18
Posts: 107
Default Re: The F-22

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperKungFu View Post
The F-14 was retired because the maintaining the aircraft became too costly. Especially that swing-wing design, so the hornet now carries on the torch.
Your 100% correct but now that the USN may not get the F35 what will they do. Get the F-22 (if the line reopens) or use the F/A-18 alone however if this does happen there's a gap between the F/A-18 and F-14 and the SU-33 has weapons that can be fired from BVR and the F-18 will have to go nose to nose
N708DN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2010, 02:49 PM   #12
Always votes for bush...
 
CitationDrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edwards AFB, CA
Posts: 511
Default Re: The F-22

Whereas the F/A-18 E and F Super Hornets fill in a niche in air superiority, and the E/A-18G Growler has taken on the 'wild weasel' role, let's not forget the other Navy program that is spooling up...the X-45B UAV.
__________________
CitationDrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 07:46 PM   #13
addicted
 
champpitbull2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 763
Default Re: The F-22

Well here is some good news. F-35 Hovers for First Time - Defense News The F-35 will be built. It's importance will outweigh it's costs because of how many air forces depend on it's creation. It's not going to be as good in a dog fight as an F-22, but it will fill the multi-role mission much better. It's extremely important for the US and its allies to be able to field an aircraft as technologicaly advanced as the F-35. If an air war were to break out right now, F-22's would probably take the lions share of air-air duties. Having allies equipped with the F-35 will allow the US to share the burden as well as create a bigger deterent for any war to start in the first place. Walk softly and carry a big stick. My point is that when they decided to cut off funding for the F-22 it was because of how expensive it was and it was constantly compared to the F-35. Well, depending on what cost you believe (the sources and prices vary depending on what their agenda is) The price per plane is as close as 15 million. The 180 F-22's are supposed to fill the role now occupied by over 500 F-15's. The F-35 is going to be in production for a long time. There are already close to 1,500 on order with many air forces that already fly the F-16, projected to jump on board as well. The USAF could build 100 or more Raptors now and build those 100 or so F-35's later. In my eyes the F-35 isn't as critical now because the air to ground mission being carried out by F16's, F-18's, A-10's and AV-8B's is doing fine and is unchallenged. It's in the air-air role that these planes may be out matched by newer Russian built planes such as the SU-27 family. (Su-27,30, 33,34, and so on. These planes are becoming more and more prevelant across the globe and are sought after by countries that western nations won't sell arms too. In short, I just wish the USAF would buy more F-22's.
champpitbull2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 08:10 PM   #14
Delta Collector
 
N708DN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Age: 18
Posts: 107
Default Re: The F-22

Quote:
Originally Posted by champpitbull2 View Post
Well here is some good news. F-35 Hovers for First Time - Defense News The F-35 will be built. It's importance will outweigh it's costs because of how many air forces depend on it's creation. It's not going to be as good in a dog fight as an F-22, but it will fill the multi-role mission much better. It's extremely important for the US and its allies to be able to field an aircraft as technologicaly advanced as the F-35. If an air war were to break out right now, F-22's would probably take the lions share of air-air duties. Having allies equipped with the F-35 will allow the US to share the burden as well as create a bigger deterent for any war to start in the first place. Walk softly and carry a big stick. My point is that when they decided to cut off funding for the F-22 it was because of how expensive it was and it was constantly compared to the F-35. Well, depending on what cost you believe (the sources and prices vary depending on what their agenda is) The price per plane is as close as 15 million. The 180 F-22's are supposed to fill the role now occupied by over 500 F-15's. The F-35 is going to be in production for a long time. There are already close to 1,500 on order with many air forces that already fly the F-16, projected to jump on board as well. The USAF could build 100 or more Raptors now and build those 100 or so F-35's later. In my eyes the F-35 isn't as critical now because the air to ground mission being carried out by F16's, F-18's, A-10's and AV-8B's is doing fine and is unchallenged. It's in the air-air role that these planes may be out matched by newer Russian built planes such as the SU-27 family. (Su-27,30, 33,34, and so on. These planes are becoming more and more prevelant across the globe and are sought after by countries that western nations won't sell arms too. In short, I just wish the USAF would buy more F-22's.
I agree with that the USAF DOES need more F-22s and I wish the Navy did buy some
N708DN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 12:38 PM   #15
El Chupacabra
 
gospodin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Age: 54
Posts: 4,961
Default Re: The F-22

Quote:
Originally Posted by CitationDrvr View Post
Whereas the F/A-18 E and F Super Hornets fill in a niche in air superiority, and the E/A-18G Growler has taken on the 'wild weasel' role, let's not forget the other Navy program that is spooling up...the X-45B UAV.
Actually, the Weasels have always been Air Force, and the F-16 fills that role right now. The Growler is a stand-off ECM aircraft, though it does have weapons capability. It's doing what the EA-6B Prowler used to do for the Navy. The F-35 is going to be the next Weasel, and probably the best. But the UCAV programs are getting a lot of attention, and may be the way we go in the next 50 years...no more dead pilots.
__________________
Steve







It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others...
gospodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 1998 - 2010, DiecastAircraft.com & Wings900.com - All rights reserved
Designed By: vBSkinworks