Go Back   DA.C > Miscellaneous > 1:1 Scale Commercial Aviation

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 08-13-2003, 11:29 AM   #1
Senior Collector
 
Southwest4Boi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mars
Posts: 152
Post America West Coast to Coast Service

America West Airlines will start flying from Los Angeles to Boston and New York, from San Fransisco to Boston, and New York, from Boston to San Fransisco, and Los Angeles, and from New York to Los Angeles and San Fransicso.
__________________
Fly Southwest!
Southwest4Boi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2003, 01:59 AM   #2
Insane Collector
 
flick70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omaha
Age: 38
Posts: 1,042
Default

That is the most long-winded description of four new routes I have ever seen.

Good for them. The big-boys need a wake-up call.
flick70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2003, 12:20 PM   #3
NYCAAer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AW will be using A319s, and the flights will only be twice daily. I don't know if it will make much of a dent in the transcon business of American, United and Delta. In the JFK-LAX market, AA has 9 daily 767-200s, UA 7 daily 767-200s, and DL 4 or 5 daily 767-300ERs, depending on the season.

JFK-LAX is the single most profitable route in AA's network, so it will be interesting to see how they defend their market share.

One thing that has adversely affected the JFK-LAX route is the fact that the Hollywood crowd who have supported the routes since the 1950s have been abandoning commercial flights because the additional security is a hassle for them, so they are flying more and more on private jets. They can go to a smaller airport, get to their Gulfstream IV in minutes and be on their way. They don't even have to deal with traffic and waiting to take off. Even if they're not quite wealthy enough to own and maintain their own plane, they can timeshare, and it's more "affordable."
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2003, 09:02 AM   #4
Insane Collector
 
Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Escondido, Ca. USA
Age: 50
Posts: 2,763
Smile

Someone needs new hubs in PHX and LAS. Oh, wait, that might be Starfish in 2004!!
__________________
Fly the Friendly Skies of United

uniTED takes wing Feb 12, 2004
Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2003, 12:05 PM   #5
Senior Collector
 
Southwest4Boi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mars
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Scott
Someone needs new hubs in PHX and LAS. Oh, wait, that might be Starfish in 2004!!
Starfish?

tell me more
__________________
Fly Southwest!
Southwest4Boi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2003, 02:10 PM   #6
NYCAAer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Southwest4Boi
Starfish?

tell me more
The code name given to United's low-cost project, if it ever does come to fruition. I don't think anything has been set in stone yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2003, 01:27 AM   #7
Insane Collector
 
Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Escondido, Ca. USA
Age: 50
Posts: 2,763
Smile

"Starfish" is the in-house code for a low-cost United branded airline set for introduction in the 1st quarter of 2004. Thus far 40 existing aircraft will be allocated for the service which will focus on leisure destinations. Pilots, flight attendants, and all maintenance action will be provided by current employees earning the same wages. A few of the projected cities are: Las Vegas, Phoenix, Minneapolis, San Juan, Anchorage (!), San Diego, San Francisco, and approx 10 others initially.
__________________
Fly the Friendly Skies of United

uniTED takes wing Feb 12, 2004
Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 03:57 PM   #8
Master Collector
 
Jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: BAA Indianapolis
Posts: 583
Default

That is good for them to get back into this market!
HP had a SNA-JFK nonstop at one time.
__________________
One Nation under God

There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth
Jeremy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 01:18 AM   #9
Insane Collector
 
Travis Campbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Detroit, Michigan (Roughly)
Age: 27
Posts: 1,067
Send a message via ICQ to Travis Campbell Send a message via AIM to Travis Campbell
Default

Hey Scott, any word on the rumors of United World Wide Cargo coming back? I heard they would come back with dedicated freighters (i.e- 747-400F's).
Travis Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 09:41 AM   #10
NYCAAer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy
That is good for them to get back into this market!
HP had a SNA-JFK nonstop at one time.
AA is currently flying 3 daily 757s on JFK-SNA, and the fares are low, with no coach fare higher than $299. AA is also flying JFK-LGB with the same fare structure, to compete with Jet Blue.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 07:02 PM   #11
Retired Hookah Master
 
richie154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley of Heart's Delight
Age: 24
Posts: 3,718
Send a message via AIM to richie154 Send a message via Yahoo to richie154
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Travis Campbell
Hey Scott, any word on the rumors of United World Wide Cargo coming back? I heard they would come back with dedicated freighters (i.e- 747-400F's).
that would be interesting!
__________________
The Devil can cite Scripture for his purpose. An evil soul producing holy witness is like a villian with a smiling cheek, a goodly apple rotten at the heart. Oh, what a goodly outside falsehood hath!

Private Pilot: 10/20/2005
Private Multi Engine: 05/09/2008
The more things change, the more Mesa still sucks.
richie154 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 11:33 PM   #12
Insane Collector
 
Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Escondido, Ca. USA
Age: 50
Posts: 2,763
Smile

Good question Travis and Richie.... despite the booming cargo market there are no plans that I know of to restart the worldwide cargo network. There was talk of converting some of the desert-dwelling 747-400's into freighters, but most will be placed into passenger service. During bankruptcy 2 things occurred to raise their value to UA: First, the pilot wages were reduced to 777 pay scales, and then further cut by 30%. Secondly, the lessors for the non UA owned birds were severely hammered to reflect the poor market for the biggest Boeings - something they couldn't achieve with the marketable 777's. Consequently, it's now the cheapest seat-mile aircraft in the UA fleet. Expect them to be flown till they drop!
__________________
Fly the Friendly Skies of United

uniTED takes wing Feb 12, 2004
Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
Copyright © 1998 - 2008, DiecastAircraft.com & Wings900.com - All rights reserved
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

© 1997-2006 DiecastAircraftForum.com. This website, the content, the design and the pictures and are intended for public non commercial use, and may be redistributed, freely printed, or electronically reproduced in its complete and unaltered form provided distribution is for private use only. Partial and other distribution means require the permission of Wings900. All rights reserved.