Go Back   DA.C > Miscellaneous > 1:1 Scale Commercial Aviation

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 05-28-2003, 12:48 PM   #1
Collector
 
B6GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 55
Send a message via AIM to B6GUY Send a message via Yahoo to B6GUY
Default JetBlue Airways

It seems that another post has turned into a jetBlue post in error... so I thought I would start one to see if there were any GENERAL questions, comments, thoughts on:

JetBlue - the company, management, etc.
HUB - JFK or LGB
Aircraft - A320's
Service - DirecTV, Inflight, Customer Service
Route - Current/Future, Cities you would like to see

Anything else?!?

B6GUY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2003, 12:54 PM   #2
Complete Wacko!
 
Chansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 3,041
Arrow Frontier is fallowing JetBlue's example!

Quote:
Originally posted by B6GUY
Also, many industry analysts point to the better pricing that Airbus offers its customers than Boeing does... and with the recent additional purchase that JBU has made, which would make it the largest A320 operator WORLDWIDE... I am sure that enhances their pricing power with Airbus.
Currently I have heard that Frontier is removing all Boeing equiptment and going to a full Airbus fleet with A319 and A318 aircraft. Frontier is due to get its A318 soon I have heard from a friend that works for them.

Is Frontier is some sort of deal with Jet Blue? I have noticed that the Ground handling is by Frontier for JetBlue.
Chansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2003, 12:59 PM   #3
Master Collector
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Melville, NY
Posts: 512
Default

Why can't Boeing deliver this MAY be why:

Airbus Industrie can't seem to get a ticket to the hottest party in its own neighborhood--the rapid expansion of no-frills air travel in Europe. None of the region's discount carriers, from Ryanair to easyJet to Virgin Express, owns an Airbus plane. And there was little surprise on Jan. 24 when rival Boeing Co. (BA ) landed an order for up to 150 Boeing 737-800s from Ryanair, a deal that ensures the Dublin-based carrier will remain all-Boeing for at least the next 10 years.

Airbus, based in Toulouse, France, faces an uphill fight to win over Europe's discount airlines, which are expected to buy as many as 300 planes over the next 10 years, even as European flag carriers such as the bankrupt Sabena and Swissair have canceled dozens of Airbus orders.

Why can't Airbus grab a piece of the action? Its A320 model, the chief competitor to the 737, lists for only $54 million, compared to about $60 million for the Boeing plane. But the A320 has nine fewer seats than the 189-seat 737, which works out to $1 million less annual passenger revenue per plane. Most important, the 737 has been flying since 1966, some 22 years longer than the A320. That has created a large supply of secondhand 737s for discount carriers starting up on a shoestring.

And once a no-frills airline gets hooked on one plane, it stays hooked. Discount carriers usually fly only one model of plane to keep down maintenance and training costs--an approach pioneered by the leading U.S. discount carrier, Southwest Airlines, which flies exclusively 737s. Ryanair bought its first batch of 737s in 1994 and has stuck with them ever since. The story is much the same at easyJet Airline Co., the No. 2 European discounter, and at Britain's Virgin Express. London-based Go also uses the 737, as does KLM's Buzz. "The 737 is the aircraft of choice for low-cost carriers," boasts Toby Bright, executive vice-president for sales at Boeing.

Airbus is caught in a corner. To sell these carriers the A320, it would not only have to match deep discounts being offered by Boeing but also throw in extras such as discounted spare parts and free training for pilots and mechanics. In better economic times, Airbus might have done just that. But with aircraft orders worldwide expected to drop 60% this year, Airbus can scarcely afford such generosity. Indeed analysts say Boeing's margins on recent sales to discounters have been razor-thin.

That's why the betting is on Boeing to win a big order soon from easyJet. The London-based carrier announced recently that it wants to buy 75 planes and will consider the Airbus A320. But most industry analysts figure easyJet is just trying to squeeze a better price out of Boeing, which is estimated to have sold the 737-800 to Ryanair for less than $40 million per plane. Airbus says it will bid aggressively on the easyJet deal. But, says Airbus commercial director John Leahy, "We have no intention of being drawn into a price war."

Airbus has had better luck breaking into no-frills travel in the U.S. than on its home turf. It has found a loyal customer in New York-based JetBlue Airways Corp., a two-year-old carrier that has a fleet of 22 Airbus A320s, with up to 132 more on order. And two years ago, Airbus persuaded Denver-based Frontier Airlines Inc. to phase out its fleet of 24 Boeing 737s and switch to two smaller Airbus models, the A318 and A319. Frontier and JetBlue say the Airbus planes are more fuel-efficient and offer wider seats. "I see no reason why, worldwide, we won't eventually have the same kind of market share with the discount carriers that we have with other carriers," Leahy says. In Europe, though, it's still Boeing's party.
__________________
Ken (EastCoast)
EastCoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2003, 01:16 PM   #4
NYCAAer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I thought EasyJet placed a huge order for A319s recently. The above article seems a little old, because JetBlue has 41 A320s now, not 22.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2003, 01:40 PM   #5
Master Collector
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Melville, NY
Posts: 512
Default

I have now received confirmation that JetBlue did speak with Boeing regarding the Boeing 737-800 and Boeing could not deliver the allocated planes to JetBlue in the time slot they required.

This article above, which is dated over 1 - 2 years ago may indicate why Boeing could not deliver, do to the large number of orders from discount carriers.
__________________
Ken (EastCoast)

Last edited by EastCoast; 05-28-2003 at 01:58 PM.
EastCoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2003, 02:09 PM   #6
NYCAAer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JetBlue Airways

Quote:
Originally posted by B6GUY
It seems that another post has turned into a jetBlue post in error... so I thought I would start one to see if there were any GENERAL questions, comments, thoughts on:

JetBlue - the company, management, etc.
HUB - JFK or LGB
Aircraft - A320's
Service - DirecTV, Inflight, Customer Service
Route - Current/Future, Cities you would like to see

Anything else?!?

No airline likes to release its future routes before they start operating them for some reason. The rumor mill says they're looking at starting up service to MDW, DFW, & HOU/IAH.

I read from a paper in LGB, that because they're not making as much as planned on short-hauls to OAK & LAS, & because they only have so many slots there, they were thinking about replacing the short-hauls with more longer flights, to maximize earning potential.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2003, 02:55 PM   #7
Collector
 
B6GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 55
Send a message via AIM to B6GUY Send a message via Yahoo to B6GUY
Default Re: Re: JetBlue Airways

Quote:
Originally posted by NYCAAer
...The rumor mill says they're looking at starting up service to MDW, DFW, & HOU/IAH.

...because they're not making as much as planned on short-hauls to OAK & LAS, & because they only have so many slots there, they were thinking about replacing the short-hauls with more longer flights, to maximize earning potential.
1) I think the opportunities for new cities are almost limitless, with a low cost structure and a strong customer following, success is not that hard to find (relatively speaking, I don't think they will start a JFK-TYS or JFK-EYW)...

2) Re: OAK and LGB for short-haul, doesn't it make sense to maximize earnings and move to longer hauls where RASM is higher?
B6GUY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2003, 05:17 PM   #8
Clipper Speedy Kitty
 
Yukon 880's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Anchorage, The Great State of Alaska
Posts: 773
Send a message via Yahoo to Yukon 880
Thumbs up Re: Re: Re: JetBlue Airways

Quote:
Originally posted by B6GUY
1) I think the opportunities for new cities are almost limitless, with a low cost structure and a strong customer following, success is not that hard to find (relatively speaking, I don't think they will start a JFK-TYS or JFK-EYW)...

2) Re: OAK and LGB for short-haul, doesn't it make sense to maximize earnings and move to longer hauls where RASM is higher?
Hello B6,

I agree that the possibilities are endless! Personally, I am eager for a north-westward expansion (pardon the pun) to Alaska. The JetBlue brand of service would work nicely into the mix here in Anchorage.

For starters, I could see the possibility of profit in a seasonal schedule for the summer rush. Originate a service in Long Beach with an intermediate in Seattle and contiunue up the coast. Plan the same sort of arrangement with a flight originating in JFK and stop in SLC. That way you get traffic from both coasts, headed for their Alaska vacation!

Y'all come on up, the fish are running, the weather is great and the days are mighty long!
__________________
Fly Delta's Big Jets!
Yukon 880 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
Copyright © 1998 - 2008, DiecastAircraft.com & Wings900.com - All rights reserved
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

© 1997-2006 DiecastAircraftForum.com. This website, the content, the design and the pictures and are intended for public non commercial use, and may be redistributed, freely printed, or electronically reproduced in its complete and unaltered form provided distribution is for private use only. Partial and other distribution means require the permission of Wings900. All rights reserved.