Go Back   DA.C > Miscellaneous > 1:1 Scale Commercial Aviation

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-22-2002, 07:46 PM   #1
Insane Collector
 
Gordon Werner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Location: Somewhere else
Age: 37
Posts: 2,059
Exclamation UAL pulls plug on business jet unit Avolar

Friday March 22, 6:31 pm Eastern Time

UAL pulls plug on business jet unit Avolar

CHICAGO, March 22 (Reuters) - UAL Corp., parent of United Airlines, said on Friday it will shut its business jet unit, Avolar, after finding no viable options for the company in an industry hurt by the Sept. 11 attacks and the weak economy.

UAL said earlier in March it had stopped seeking outside investors for Avolar, which offered part ownership in corporate jets, and planned no further investment of its own.

The No. 2 U.S. carrier formed Avolar in May 2001 to tap corporate America's appetite for business jet travel, but UAL posted an industry record net loss of $2.1 billion last year following the attacks and the weak economy.

UAL decided to look for outside investors for the start-up following the attacks, but a months-long search was called off in early March and Avolar President Stuart Oran stepped down.

In a short statement, UAL Chief Executive Jack Creighton said closing Avolar was ``the most prudent move possible.''

Creighton, who took over as chief executive in October, said closing the unit would protect United from further financial exposure and help it focus on core business.

"The real message here is that you have new management at United," industry consultant Michael Boyd said. "This shows that they are refocusing on the airline industry, on their core business."

UAL said it has started to notify Avolar customers of the closing and anticipates an orderly shutdown. There is no timetable for closing Avolar, which has 83 employees.

UAL had invested $102 million in Avolar through January, according to regulatory filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. It could face a significant write-off if the new strategy fails, UAL said in the March filing.

"I think this is a very postive thing,'' Boyd said. "It says United Airlines is turning around; actually, it's as good as turned around when you have that kind of management there. It took guts for him to do this because they've got a lot of money tied up in Avolar.''

Avolar offered shares in Beechjets made by Raytheon Co., Learjets by Bombardier Inc., Gulfstreams by General Dynamics Corp. and Falcons by Dassault Aviation.
Gordon Werner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2002, 09:05 PM   #2
Insane Collector
 
Bill G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,227
Send a message via AIM to Bill G
Default Avolar

This is probably the second smartest move United has made in recent months. Topping the list of course is forcing Goodwin out of the picture. United is a great airline and will bounce back.

Bill G
__________________
Ozark Flies Your Way

FEES DON'T FLY AT SOUTHWEST
Bill G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2002, 09:49 PM   #3
Insane Collector
 
NEADC9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Franklin, MA
Posts: 981
Default

I hope they do (bounce back). It is the only airline I fly on. Or at least try to fly on. Headed to PIT the beginning of this week on UA Express CRJ and J-41 through IAD. I originate out of PVD. I love both the CRJ (with the exception of the neck strain) and J-41 (no neck strain there with thosebig windows!)

Go United!
NEADC9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2002, 11:55 PM   #4
Insane Collector
 
Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Escondido, Ca. USA
Age: 50
Posts: 2,763
Smile

Hi Bill, thanks for your kind thoughts. The only way to survive the post 9-11 era is to concentrate on the core business. I hope Siegel will achive great strides for USAirways, particularly if the wolfman joins his puppet goodwin in the Shangri-La of retirement.
You've all been through the ringer and deserve a change for the better!
__________________
Fly the Friendly Skies of United

uniTED takes wing Feb 12, 2004
Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2002, 12:27 AM   #5
Insane Collector
 
Bill G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,227
Send a message via AIM to Bill G
Default

Thanks Scott. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that Siegel will show some leadership and has a workable plan for the future of US Airways. Hopefully we can see some growth eventually instead of shrinking as we have been doing over the past 10 years or so.
I do have a friend who is in upper management at Southwest who says he can get me in a training class, all I have to do is say when. This is a definite plan B, but the last thing I want to do is start all over again. (Been there, done that. Thank you Carl Ichan) It would be a 75% paycut.
If US Airways does sink, I'll jump on the chance, but until then I gotta hope for the best.

Bill G
__________________
Ozark Flies Your Way

FEES DON'T FLY AT SOUTHWEST
Bill G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2002, 01:39 AM   #6
Insane Collector
 
Travelin' Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Aspen USA!!!
Posts: 1,919
Default

A step in the right direction. Avolar was nothing but a stupid business venture that wasted a ton of money that could have helped UAL at a time when they needed it.
Travelin' Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2002, 12:01 PM   #7
Master Collector
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 798
Default

I find it fascinating that UAL determined there to be no viable future for this venture when organizations like NetJet and other 'time-share' bizjet companies has seen new customers and revenue skyrocket since 9/11.

It's also quite ironic to read the glowing article about Avolar in this months issue of Airways and then see this announcement...


Good to hear from you BillG -- I haven't seen you post around and about DAC for a while. Hope all is well for you...
Tony Sepanski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
Copyright © 1998 - 2008, DiecastAircraft.com & Wings900.com - All rights reserved
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

© 1997-2006 DiecastAircraftForum.com. This website, the content, the design and the pictures and are intended for public non commercial use, and may be redistributed, freely printed, or electronically reproduced in its complete and unaltered form provided distribution is for private use only. Partial and other distribution means require the permission of Wings900. All rights reserved.